PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILIT vs. CRML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILIT vs. CRML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILIT achieves a -5.59% return, which is significantly lower than CRML's 7.35% return.


ILIT

1D
-3.92%
1M
-25.26%
6M
-19.17%
YTD
-5.59%
1Y
75.05%
3Y*
-14.39%
5Y*
10Y*

CRML

1D
-6.29%
1M
-24.75%
6M
-49.53%
YTD
7.35%
1Y
148.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILIT vs. CRML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
-5.59%81.51%-31.02%
CRML
Critical Metals Corp
7.35%2.21%-24.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ILIT and CRML is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024

0.28

The correlation between ILIT and CRML shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILIT vs. CRML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILIT
ILIT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ILIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ILIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CRML
CRML Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILIT vs. CRML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILITCRMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.92

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.41

2.67

+3.74

ILIT vs. CRML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the CRML Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILIT and CRML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILIT vs. CRML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILIT drawdown since its inception was -73.69%, smaller than the maximum CRML drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILIT and CRML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILITCRMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.69%

-93.91%

+20.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.91%

-77.74%

+39.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.24%

-75.14%

+36.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-68.12%

+22.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.74%

55.73%

-43.99%

Volatility

ILIT vs. CRML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) is 14.66%, while Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a volatility of 22.15%. This indicates that ILIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILITCRMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.66%

22.15%

-7.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.14%

93.92%

-58.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.96%

160.44%

-109.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.05%

182.69%

-140.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.05%

182.69%

-140.64%

Dividends

ILIT vs. CRML - Dividend Comparison

ILIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while CRML has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CRML
Critical Metals Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
2.18%2.27%6.48%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILIT and CRML have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRML has higher volatility (22.15%) compared to ILIT (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILIT dropped -73.69% vs CRML's -93.91%.

ILIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILIT and CRML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer