PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILDR vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILDR vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.16% return.


ILDR

1D
1.11%
1M
-4.81%
6M
10.66%
YTD
10.34%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
10.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.99%

FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M
$1.72M$2.15M$1.99M

ILDR vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
10.34%29.22%29.31%39.34%-34.95%7.57%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.16%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%8.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ILDR and FDL is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.29

The correlation between ILDR and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ILDR vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILDR
FDL

Technology

37.8%
4.3%

Healthcare

13.4%
11.7%

Industrials

13.4%
3.6%

Utilities

7.3%
15.4%

Communication Services

6.1%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
4.4%

Financial Services

4.9%
13.7%

Basic Materials

1.2%
0.4%

Energy

1.2%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

ILDR
37.8%
FDL
4.3%

Healthcare

ILDR
13.4%
FDL
11.7%

Industrials

ILDR
13.4%
FDL
3.6%

Utilities

ILDR
7.3%
FDL
15.4%

Communication Services

ILDR
6.1%
FDL
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ILDR
4.9%
FDL
4.4%

Financial Services

ILDR
4.9%
FDL
13.7%

Basic Materials

ILDR
1.2%
FDL
0.4%

Energy

ILDR
1.2%
FDL
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

ILDR

-

FDL
24.3%

Real Estate

ILDR

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILDR vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ILDR
ILDR Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ILDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILDR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ILDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILDR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ILDR vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILDRFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.39

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

6.29

-5.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.28

14.86

-11.58

ILDR vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILDR vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILDRFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.61%

-65.93%

+21.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-4.27%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.43%

-12.24%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.61%

-16.46%

-28.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.21%

-1.96%

-8.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-9.59%

-5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

1.81%

+4.20%

Volatility

ILDR vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.96%. This indicates that ILDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILDRFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

4.96%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.87%

8.97%

+10.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.43%

11.95%

+12.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

14.44%

+12.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.27%

17.16%

+9.11%

ILDR vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILDR vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILDR and FDL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILDR has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to FDL (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILDR dropped -44.61% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 13.98% vs 10.56% for ILDR. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ILDR.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for ILDR.

ILDR is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ILDR and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILDR and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer