PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILDR vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILDR vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return.


ILDR

1D
-1.06%
1M
13.98%
YTD
21.58%
6M
21.69%
1Y
47.41%
3Y*
31.44%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILDR vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
21.58%29.22%29.31%39.34%-34.95%7.29%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ILDR and FDL is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.32

The correlation between ILDR and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ILDR vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILDR
FDL

Technology

45.2%
1.1%

Healthcare

14.7%
16.8%

Industrials

12.8%
3.8%

Communication Services

10.2%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
3.8%

Financial Services

3.1%
15.1%

Energy

2.0%
27.3%

Utilities

1.9%
6.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

ILDR
45.2%
FDL
1.1%

Healthcare

ILDR
14.7%
FDL
16.8%

Industrials

ILDR
12.8%
FDL
3.8%

Communication Services

ILDR
10.2%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ILDR
10.2%
FDL
3.8%

Financial Services

ILDR
3.1%
FDL
15.1%

Energy

ILDR
2.0%
FDL
27.3%

Utilities

ILDR
1.9%
FDL
6.5%

Basic Materials

ILDR

-

FDL
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

ILDR

-

FDL
14.7%

Real Estate

ILDR

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILDR vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILDR
ILDR Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ILDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILDR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ILDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILDR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILDR vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILDRFDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

2.11

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

3.25

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

5.56

-2.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.00

13.56

-4.55

ILDR vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILDRFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.11

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.88

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.45

+0.11

Drawdowns

ILDR vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILDRFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.61%

-65.93%

+21.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-4.27%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.43%

-12.24%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.61%

-16.46%

-28.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-2.18%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.98%

-9.66%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

1.75%

+3.53%

Volatility

ILDR vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that ILDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILDRFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

2.85%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.21%

7.87%

+8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.11%

11.28%

+9.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.07%

14.31%

+11.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

17.11%

+8.91%

ILDR vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILDR vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILDR and FDL have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILDR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILDR dropped -44.61% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, ILDR leads with 14.40% vs 12.51% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILDR has performed better with a 14.40% return vs 12.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ILDR.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for ILDR.

ILDR is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ILDR and 0.45% for FDL.

ILDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILDR and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer