PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILDR vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ILDR vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ILDR vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
-9.73%29.22%29.31%39.34%-34.95%7.29%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
-1.95%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%18.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a -9.73% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's -1.95% return.


ILDR

1D
4.70%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-9.73%
6M
-8.06%
1Y
27.69%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10Y*

QTUM

1D
5.03%
1M
-7.65%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
2.90%
1Y
45.59%
3Y*
33.36%
5Y*
18.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ILDR vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ILDR vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILDR
ILDR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ILDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILDR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ILDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILDR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILDR vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILDRQTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.54

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

2.17

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.91

-1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.02

10.27

-5.25

ILDR vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and QTUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILDRQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.54

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.83

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between ILDR and QTUM is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ILDR vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
1.09%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Drawdowns

ILDR vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and QTUM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ILDRQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.61%

-38.45%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-15.26%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.83%

-11.00%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-8.40%

-7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

4.32%

+0.96%

Volatility

ILDR vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) is 8.51%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 10.18%. This indicates that ILDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ILDRQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.51%

10.18%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

20.80%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.60%

29.67%

-3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.13%

26.23%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.13%

27.05%

-0.92%