ILDR vs. FNGS

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a -2.82% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's -4.29% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ILDR nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) is 8.87%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 10.27%. This indicates that ILDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.