PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ILCB vs. QWLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ILCB vs. QWLD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index while QWLD tracks the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCB returned 14.42%/yr vs 11.64%/yr for QWLD. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ILCB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.

Performance

ILCB vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than QWLD's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCB has outperformed QWLD with an annualized return of 14.42%, while QWLD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.64% annualized return.

ILCB

1D
1.54%
1M
1.56%
6M
9.71%
YTD
11.73%
1Y
23.00%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
14.42%
ALL TIME*
11.23%

QWLD

1D
0.58%
1M
2.22%
6M
5.89%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
11.64%
ALL TIME*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

ILCB

iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
$1.31M$1.30M$1.40M

QWLD

SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
$247.86K$289.30K$1.06M

ILCB vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF		11.73%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF		10.03%17.93%14.44%19.59%-13.30%21.57%10.24%27.59%-7.02%22.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCB and QWLD is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2014

0.75

The correlation between ILCB and QWLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ILCB vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ILCB
QWLD

Technology

38.4%
24.9%

Financial Services

11.4%
16.5%

Communication Services

9.8%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
6.3%

Healthcare

9.0%
13.2%

Industrials

8.9%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
8.1%

Energy

3.1%
3.4%

Utilities

2.2%
3.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.0%

Technology

ILCB
38.4%
QWLD
24.9%

Financial Services

ILCB
11.4%
QWLD
16.5%

Communication Services

ILCB
9.8%
QWLD
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCB
9.4%
QWLD
6.3%

Healthcare

ILCB
9.0%
QWLD
13.2%

Industrials

ILCB
8.9%
QWLD
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

ILCB
4.4%
QWLD
8.1%

Energy

ILCB
3.1%
QWLD
3.4%

Utilities

ILCB
2.2%
QWLD
3.8%

Basic Materials

ILCB
1.8%
QWLD
2.5%

Real Estate

ILCB
1.7%
QWLD
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF

SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF

Often compared with ILCB:
ILCB vs. ILCGILCB vs. VOOILCB vs. IVVILCB vs. SPYILCB vs. SCHBILCB vs. VTIILCB vs. BBUS
Often compared with QWLD:
QWLD vs. URTHQWLD vs. DGTQWLD vs. SPGMQWLD vs. VTQWLD vs. VWICXQWLD vs. JPGL.LQWLD vs. QVML

Return for Risk

ILCB vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
QWLD
QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ILCB vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ILCBQWLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.78
2.06

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.47
2.91

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.60

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

11.35

-0.61

ILCB vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCB and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILCB vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, which is greater than QWLD's maximum drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and QWLD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ILCBQWLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.53%

-31.89%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-7.66%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-12.40%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

-22.84%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.30%

-31.89%

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-3.66%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.75%

+0.40%

Volatility

ILCB vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.28%. This indicates that ILCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ILCBQWLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

2.28%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.31%

7.74%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

9.70%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

13.51%

+3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

15.12%

+3.08%

ILCB vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILCB vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than QWLD's 1.78% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF		0.97%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF		1.78%1.85%1.74%1.78%2.02%1.77%1.77%2.13%2.33%2.73%2.22%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

ILCB and QWLD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCB has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to QWLD (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCB dropped -51.53% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

On 10-year performance, ILCB leads with 14.42% vs 11.64% for QWLD. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 14.42% return vs 11.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QWLD.

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.97% for ILCB.

ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ILCB and 0.30% for QWLD.

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCB and QWLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer