QWLD vs. URTH
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH).
QWLD and URTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QWLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). It was launched on Jun 4, 2014. URTH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. Both QWLD and URTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QWLD or URTH.
Performance
QWLD vs. URTH - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QWLD achieves a 16.38% return, which is significantly lower than URTH's 19.56% return. Over the past 10 years, QWLD has outperformed URTH with an annualized return of 12.71%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.
QWLD
16.38%
-1.32%
6.17%
21.78%
10.82%
12.71%
URTH
19.56%
0.03%
8.70%
26.46%
12.37%
10.08%
Key characteristics
| QWLD | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.29 | 2.24 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.23 | 3.06 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.41 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.92 | 3.18 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.68 | 14.10 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.48% | 1.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.46% | 11.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.89% | -34.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.22% | -1.55% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QWLD vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QWLD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between QWLD and URTH is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QWLD vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QWLD vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison
QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than URTH's 1.44% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 2.33% | 2.73% | 2.22% | 3.42% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.44% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.35% | 2.32% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
QWLD vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QWLD drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, smaller than the maximum URTH drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWLD and URTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QWLD vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) is 2.59%, while iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that QWLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.