ILCB vs. QARP
ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ILCB returned 12.78%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILCB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
ILCB vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 9.04%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 21.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 10.64% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 32.68% | -5.88% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCB and QARP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between ILCB and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCB vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCB
QARP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ILCB
QARP
Financial Services
ILCB
QARP
Communication Services
ILCB
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
ILCB
QARP
Healthcare
ILCB
QARP
Industrials
ILCB
QARP
Consumer Defensive
ILCB
QARP
Energy
ILCB
QARP
Utilities
ILCB
QARP
Basic Materials
ILCB
QARP
Real Estate
ILCB
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCB vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
ILCB
QARP
ILCB vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILCB | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 3.46 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 15.38 | -5.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILCB vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, which is greater than QARP's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCB | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.53% | -35.44% | -16.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -7.26% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -15.65% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -22.75% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | 0.00% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -4.39% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.63% | +0.47% |
Volatility
ILCB vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that ILCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCB | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 2.76% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.10% | 8.22% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 10.58% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 15.54% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 19.55% | -1.39% |
ILCB vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCB vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCB and QARP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILCB has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCB dropped -51.53% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 12.78% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.98% for ILCB.
ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ILCB and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCB and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer