ILCB vs. ITOT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from iShares - ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index while ITOT tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCB returned 15.08%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for ITOT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.

Performance

ILCB vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ILCB having a 11.87% return and ITOT slightly higher at 12.07%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ILCB having a 15.08% annualized return and ITOT not far ahead at 15.10%.

ILCB

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 6M: 12.21%
• 1Y: 29.71%
• 3Y*: 22.96%
• 5Y*: 13.81%
• 10Y*: 15.08%

ITOT

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 5.39%
• YTD: 12.07%
• 6M: 12.47%
• 1Y: 29.98%
• 3Y*: 22.39%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: 15.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCB vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF	11.87%	17.70%	24.96%	26.91%	-19.48%	24.07%	19.40%	32.68%	-8.51%	22.09%
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	12.07%	17.00%	23.80%	26.12%	-19.47%	25.68%	20.71%	30.67%	-5.33%	21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCB and ITOT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004	0.95

The correlation between ILCB and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCB vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ILCB	ITOT
Technology	35.5%	33.8%
Financial Services	11.7%	12.1%
Communication Services	11.4%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Industrials	8.6%	9.5%
Healthcare	8.6%	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.7%
Energy	3.5%	3.7%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.8%	2.1%

Return for Risk

ILCB vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCB

ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 73
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 78

ITOT

ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 74
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 74
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCB vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ILCB	ITOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.47	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	3.36	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.44	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	3.45	-0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.33	15.85	-0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ILCB vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCB Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCB and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ILCB	ITOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.47	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.76	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.83	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.57	+0.06

Drawdowns

ILCB vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and ITOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILCB	ITOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.53%	-55.20%	+3.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.09%	-8.90%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.05%	-19.44%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.47%	-25.36%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.30%	-35.00%	-0.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-6.97%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.93%	+0.04%

Volatility

ILCB vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILCB	ITOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	2.89%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	9.11%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.99%	12.18%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.13%	17.36%	-0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.16%	18.27%	-0.11%

ILCB vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ILCB and ITOT have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ILCB vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than ITOT's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF	0.96%	1.11%	1.19%	1.43%	1.65%	1.16%	1.26%	2.25%	2.17%	1.81%	1.97%	2.44%
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	0.97%	1.11%	1.23%	1.47%	1.66%	1.18%	1.41%	1.88%	2.14%	1.69%	1.83%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILCB and ITOT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, ILCB and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ILCB or ITOT?

ITOT has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to ILCB (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCB dropped -51.53% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

Which ETF is better, ILCB or ITOT?

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 15.10% vs 15.08% for ILCB. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILCB or ITOT?

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 15.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILCB or ITOT?

ILCB and ITOT have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILCB or ITOT?

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.96% for ILCB.

What is the main difference between ILCB and ITOT?

ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.