PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCB vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILCB vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 7.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCB has outperformed ILCV with an annualized return of 15.00%, while ILCV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.68% annualized return.


ILCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.29%
YTD
11.12%
6M
11.10%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
15.00%

ILCV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.76%
YTD
7.75%
6M
7.41%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCB vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.75%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCB and ILCV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004

0.86

The correlation between ILCB and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCB vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILCB
ILCV

Technology

35.5%
23.8%

Financial Services

11.7%
16.5%

Communication Services

11.4%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.5%

Industrials

8.6%
8.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
7.6%

Energy

3.5%
6.0%

Utilities

2.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.4%

Technology

ILCB
35.5%
ILCV
23.8%

Financial Services

ILCB
11.7%
ILCV
16.5%

Communication Services

ILCB
11.4%
ILCV
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCB
10.1%
ILCV
9.5%

Industrials

ILCB
8.6%
ILCV
8.8%

Healthcare

ILCB
8.6%
ILCV
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

ILCB
4.8%
ILCV
7.6%

Energy

ILCB
3.5%
ILCV
6.0%

Utilities

ILCB
2.3%
ILCV
3.5%

Real Estate

ILCB
1.8%
ILCV
2.0%

Basic Materials

ILCB
1.8%
ILCV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILCB vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCB vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILCBILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.50

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

4.08

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.24

16.87

-2.63

ILCB vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCB Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCB and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILCBILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.72

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.81

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.70

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.46

+0.17

Drawdowns

ILCB vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCBILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.53%

-58.63%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-6.55%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-14.95%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

-18.58%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.30%

-35.53%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.60%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-9.32%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.58%

+0.39%

Volatility

ILCB vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.01%. This indicates that ILCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILCBILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

2.01%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

6.97%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

9.82%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

14.21%

+2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

16.66%

+1.50%

ILCB vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ILCB vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than ILCV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILCB and ILCV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCB has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCB dropped -51.53% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, ILCB leads with 15.00% vs 11.68% for ILCV. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 11.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.97% for ILCB.

ILCB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ILCV is Large Cap Value Equities. ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ILCB and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCB and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer