PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCB vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ILCB vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ILCB vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
-4.57%17.70%24.96%8.80%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
4.29%40.19%24.63%6.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a -4.57% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 4.29% return.


ILCB

1D
2.92%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
-4.57%
6M
-2.23%
1Y
17.62%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.49%

DARP

1D
3.09%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
4.29%
6M
13.93%
1Y
64.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ILCB vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ILCB vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCB vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILCBDARPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

2.19

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

2.73

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.97

-2.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.11

16.42

-9.31

ILCB vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCB and DARP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILCBDARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

2.19

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.11

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between ILCB and DARP is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ILCB vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than DARP's 0.42% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
1.13%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.42%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ILCB vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and DARP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCBDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.53%

-30.27%

-21.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-15.92%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-9.09%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-4.84%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.85%

-1.28%

Volatility

ILCB vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) is 5.34%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.51%. This indicates that ILCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ILCBDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

9.51%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

19.28%

-9.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.41%

29.51%

-11.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

26.42%

-9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

26.42%

-8.28%