DARP vs. FNGU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - DARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Grizzle, while FNGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). DARP is actively managed, while FNGU is passively managed. Over the past year, DARP returned 49.32% vs 13.50% for FNGU. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DARP charges 0.75%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

DARP vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 5.54% return.

DARP

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: -3.88%
• 6M: 9.77%
• YTD: 21.09%
• 1Y: 49.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.92%

FNGU

• 1D: 5.13%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 18.28%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 1Y: 13.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	$346.01K	$294.81K	$497.24K
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	$92.08M	$119.18M	$153.90M

DARP vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	21.09%	33.11%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	5.54%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and FNGU is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.77

The correlation between DARP and FNGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

DARP vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DARP	FNGU
Technology	48.3%	60.6%
Communication Services	13.5%	29.8%
Energy	9.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	9.6%
Industrials	8.2%	-
Utilities	5.2%	-
Basic Materials	4.2%	-
Healthcare	1.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

DARP vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DARP

DARP Risk / Return Rank: 74
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 65
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 14
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DARP vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DARP	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	0.07	+1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	0.56	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.07	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	0.07	+2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.11	0.16	+10.95

DARP vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DARP and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DARP vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DARP	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.27%	-61.30%	+31.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.76%	-59.55%	+43.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.42%	-26.25%	+16.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.72%	-22.61%	+17.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	26.68%	-22.54%

Volatility

DARP vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) is 9.87%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 17.87%. This indicates that DARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DARP	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.87%	17.87%	-8.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.44%	53.81%	-32.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.87%	65.86%	-38.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.83%	79.67%	-52.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.83%	79.67%	-52.84%

DARP vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DARP vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	0.36%	0.43%	1.93%	0.32%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DARP and FNGU in my portfolio?

DARP and FNGU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DARP or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (17.87%) compared to DARP (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, DARP or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 49.32% vs 13.50% for FNGU. On fees, DARP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DARP has been the lower-risk option at 9.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DARP or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 49.32% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DARP or FNGU?

DARP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DARP or FNGU?

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between DARP and FNGU?

DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FNGU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.