IJT vs. XSMO
IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) and XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJT is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJT returned 10.78%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for XSMO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for XSMO.
Performance
IJT vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 23.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 10.78%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.
IJT
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 16.88%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 28.27%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 6M
- 21.12%
- 1Y
- 35.59%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
IJT vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 16.88% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -4.40% | 14.47% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 23.45% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJT and XSMO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IJT and XSMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJT vs. XSMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJT
XSMO
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
IJT
XSMO
Industrials
IJT
XSMO
Healthcare
IJT
XSMO
Financial Services
IJT
XSMO
Consumer Cyclical
IJT
XSMO
Real Estate
IJT
XSMO
Energy
IJT
XSMO
Basic Materials
IJT
XSMO
Consumer Defensive
IJT
XSMO
Communication Services
IJT
XSMO
Utilities
IJT
XSMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJT vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank
IJT
XSMO
IJT vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJT | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.32 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 4.02 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 13.74 | -2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJT | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.91 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.51 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
IJT vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, roughly equal to the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and XSMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJT | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.61% | -58.06% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -8.89% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | -24.76% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -29.62% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.03% | -39.39% | -2.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.52% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -11.13% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.60% | +0.01% |
Volatility
IJT vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 4.49%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJT | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 6.12% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 14.15% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 18.76% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 22.68% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 24.12% | -1.10% |
IJT vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJT vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than XSMO's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.76% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IJT and XSMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XSMO has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to IJT (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs XSMO's -58.06%.
On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 14.63% vs 10.78% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 14.63% return vs 10.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.52% for XSMO.
IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while XSMO is Momentum. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.36% for XSMO.
XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJT and XSMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer