PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 22.72% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 11.04%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.


IJT

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.81%
6M
17.16%
YTD
22.72%
1Y
32.44%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
11.04%
ALL TIME*
9.57%

VGT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.30%
6M
21.30%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.02M$33.10M$30.37M
$440.89M$515.41M$573.34M

IJT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
22.72%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
20.36%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and VGT is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.75

The correlation between IJT and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJT vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJT
VGT

Industrials

19.9%
0.4%

Technology

16.8%
98.6%

Healthcare

15.1%
0.0%

Financial Services

14.7%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
0.1%

Real Estate

7.2%

-

Energy

4.5%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

2.3%
0.5%

Utilities

1.7%

-

Industrials

IJT
19.9%
VGT
0.4%

Technology

IJT
16.8%
VGT
98.6%

Healthcare

IJT
15.1%
VGT
0.0%

Financial Services

IJT
14.7%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IJT
11.4%
VGT
0.1%

Real Estate

IJT
7.2%
VGT

-

Energy

IJT
4.5%
VGT
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

IJT
3.5%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

IJT
3.0%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

IJT
2.3%
VGT
0.5%

Utilities

IJT
1.7%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJTVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

1.94

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

5.23

+6.09

IJT vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-54.63%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-16.40%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-27.23%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-35.07%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-35.07%

-6.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-9.93%

+6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-7.95%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

6.07%

-3.39%

Volatility

IJT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 4.09%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

8.42%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

20.14%

-7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

24.28%

-6.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

25.83%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.00%

24.89%

-1.89%

IJT vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.70%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJT and VGT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to IJT (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.06% vs 11.04% for IJT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.06% return vs 11.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.

IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.09% for VGT.

IJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer