IJT vs. FYC
IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) and FYC (First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - IJT tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index while FYC tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJT returned 10.74%/yr vs 14.30%/yr for FYC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for FYC.
Performance
IJT vs. FYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly lower than FYC's 20.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has underperformed FYC with an annualized return of 10.74%, while FYC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.
IJT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 26.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
FYC
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 20.96%
- 1Y
- 53.40%
- 3Y*
- 26.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
IJT vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 15.36% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -4.40% | 14.47% |
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 20.01% | 24.24% | 23.99% | 14.52% | -25.86% | 21.64% | 32.34% | 16.79% | -5.54% | 22.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJT and FYC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IJT and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJT vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJT
FYC
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
IJT
FYC
Industrials
IJT
FYC
Healthcare
IJT
FYC
Financial Services
IJT
FYC
Consumer Cyclical
IJT
FYC
Real Estate
IJT
FYC
Energy
IJT
FYC
Basic Materials
IJT
FYC
Consumer Defensive
IJT
FYC
Communication Services
IJT
FYC
Utilities
IJT
FYC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJT vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank
IJT
FYC
IJT vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJT | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.41 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 5.12 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 18.64 | -8.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJT | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.55 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.45 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.58 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.54 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
IJT vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than FYC's maximum drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and FYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJT | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.61% | -47.85% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -10.48% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | -27.79% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -35.37% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.03% | -47.85% | +5.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.83% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -9.66% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.87% | -0.26% |
Volatility
IJT vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 4.61%, while First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJT | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 5.53% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 14.99% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.56% | 21.03% | -3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 23.62% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 24.57% | -1.55% |
IJT vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJT vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison
IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than FYC's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.72% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.12% | 0.39% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.31% | 0.21% |
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.77% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJT and FYC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FYC has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to IJT (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs FYC's -47.85%.
On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 14.30% vs 10.74% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 14.30% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.
IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.07% for FYC.
IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.71% for FYC.
FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJT and FYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer