IJH vs. EFA
IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while EFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH returned 11.03%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for EFA. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EFA.
Performance
IJH vs. EFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than EFA's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has outperformed EFA with an annualized return of 11.03%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.
IJH
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.85%
EFA
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 25.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.24B | $1.12B | $1.39B | |
| $461.96M | $459.67M | $538.23M |
IJH vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.60% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 11.69% | 31.55% | 3.49% | 18.36% | -14.39% | 11.45% | 7.60% | 22.04% | -13.82% | 25.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJH and EFA is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2001 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IJH and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJH vs. EFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJH
EFA
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IJH
EFA
Technology
IJH
EFA
Financial Services
IJH
EFA
Consumer Cyclical
IJH
EFA
Healthcare
IJH
EFA
Real Estate
IJH
EFA
Basic Materials
IJH
EFA
Energy
IJH
EFA
Consumer Defensive
IJH
EFA
Utilities
IJH
EFA
Communication Services
IJH
EFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJH vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank
IJH
EFA
IJH vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJH | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 2.18 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 8.23 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJH vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and EFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJH | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.07% | -61.04% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -11.42% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -14.05% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -29.53% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.18% | -34.19% | -7.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -0.62% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -11.86% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 3.02% | -0.60% |
Volatility
IJH vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is 3.46%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that IJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJH | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 4.69% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 13.71% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.76% | 15.79% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 16.62% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 17.00% | +4.13% |
IJH vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJH vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison
IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than EFA's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.19% | 3.38% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJH and EFA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFA has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to IJH (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs EFA's -61.04%.
On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.03% vs 9.47% for EFA. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EFA.
EFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.18% for IJH.
IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while EFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.32% for EFA.
EFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJH and EFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer