IHF vs. IGV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHF is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Healthcare Providers Index, while IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHF returned 9.45%/yr vs 16.04%/yr for IGV. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IHF charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.

Performance

IHF vs. IGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHF achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -7.81% return. Over the past 10 years, IHF has underperformed IGV with an annualized return of 9.45%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.04% annualized return.

IHF

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: 25.51%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 1Y: 40.84%
• 3Y*: 4.01%
• 5Y*: 1.74%
• 10Y*: 9.45%
• ALL TIME*: 9.87%

IGV

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 4.11%
• 6M: 8.85%
• YTD: -7.81%
• 1Y: -10.30%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 3.63%
• 10Y*: 16.04%
• ALL TIME*: 9.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	$1.47B	$1.27B	$1.69B
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF	$31.65M	$27.11M	$26.74M

IHF vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF	19.07%	0.92%	-7.90%	-1.11%	-7.11%	24.46%	17.67%	22.34%	9.56%	25.45%
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	-7.81%	5.56%	23.41%	58.56%	-35.65%	12.30%	52.86%	34.33%	12.44%	42.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IHF and IGV is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006	0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between IHF and IGV has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IHF vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IHF	IGV
Healthcare	95.2%	-
Technology	4.4%	89.3%
Financial Services	0.3%	1.9%
Industrials	0.1%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IHF vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IHF

IHF Risk / Return Rank: 70
IHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
IHF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
IHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
IHF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

IGV

IGV Risk / Return Rank: 7
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IHF vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IHF	IGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	-0.35	+2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	-0.31	+2.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.96	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	-0.28	+2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.71	-0.53	+6.24

IHF vs. IGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHF Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the IGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHF and IGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IHF vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHF drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHF and IGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IHF	IGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.42%	-63.45%	+5.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.72%	-36.61%	+16.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.85%	-36.61%	+6.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.85%	-45.85%	+16.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	-45.85%	+10.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-17.28%	+15.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.59%	-14.49%	+3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.18%	19.38%	-12.20%

Volatility

IHF vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) is 4.90%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that IHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IHF	IGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	7.40%	-2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.94%	25.09%	-12.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.35%	29.25%	-8.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.30%	28.21%	-8.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.04%	26.47%	-5.43%

IHF vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

IHF vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison

IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than IGV's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.35%	0.02%	0.16%	0.09%	0.82%	0.22%
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF	0.92%	1.05%	0.86%	0.79%	0.74%	0.56%	0.53%	0.58%	4.01%	0.19%	0.25%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IHF and IGV in my portfolio?

IHF and IGV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IHF or IGV?

IGV has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to IHF (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHF dropped -58.42% vs IGV's -63.45%.

Which ETF is better, IHF or IGV?

On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 16.04% vs 9.45% for IHF. On fees, IHF is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IHF has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IHF or IGV?

Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 16.04% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IHF or IGV?

IHF is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IHF or IGV?

IHF has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.

What is the main difference between IHF and IGV?

IHF is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IGV is Technology Equities. IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Healthcare Providers Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHF and 0.39% for IGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.