IHF vs. XLV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV).
IHF and XLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IHF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006. XLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Health Care Select Sector. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both IHF and XLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IHF or XLV.
Correlation
The correlation between IHF and XLV is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IHF vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IHF:
-0.03
XLV:
-0.35
IHF:
0.08
XLV:
-0.38
IHF:
1.01
XLV:
0.95
IHF:
-0.02
XLV:
-0.35
IHF:
-0.06
XLV:
-0.87
IHF:
8.22%
XLV:
5.27%
IHF:
17.35%
XLV:
12.99%
IHF:
-58.82%
XLV:
-39.17%
IHF:
-11.61%
XLV:
-12.92%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHF achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -1.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IHF having a 7.91% annualized return and XLV not far ahead at 8.25%.
IHF
7.50%
1.37%
-6.61%
0.49%
11.90%
7.91%
XLV
-1.28%
-9.27%
-10.04%
-3.16%
11.04%
8.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IHF vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHF has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IHF vs. XLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IHF
XLV
IHF vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IHF vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than XLV's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% | 0.18% |
XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.73% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.58% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Drawdowns
IHF vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHF drawdown since its inception was -58.82%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHF and XLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IHF vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) is 5.93%, while Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that IHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.