PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHF vs. MDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHF vs. MDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHF achieves a 18.08% return, which is significantly higher than MDEV's -3.39% return.


IHF

1D
-0.65%
1M
-1.95%
6M
24.31%
YTD
18.08%
1Y
39.67%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
9.49%
ALL TIME*
9.83%

MDEV

1D
0.39%
1M
2.37%
6M
-2.88%
YTD
-3.39%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
-0.73%
5Y*
-5.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.12M$27.16M$26.59M
$145.15K$110.14K$63.91K

IHF vs. MDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IHF
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
18.08%0.92%-7.90%-1.11%-7.11%9.68%
MDEV
First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF
-3.39%2.00%1.79%7.55%-28.59%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IHF and MDEV is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021

0.54

The correlation between IHF and MDEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IHF vs. MDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IHF
MDEV

Healthcare

95.2%
100.0%

Technology

4.4%

-

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Industrials

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IHF
95.2%
MDEV
100.0%

Technology

IHF
4.4%
MDEV

-

Financial Services

IHF
0.3%
MDEV

-

Industrials

IHF
0.1%
MDEV

-

Basic Materials

IHF

-

MDEV

-

Communication Services

IHF

-

MDEV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IHF

-

MDEV

-

Consumer Defensive

IHF

-

MDEV

-

Energy

IHF

-

MDEV

-

Real Estate

IHF

-

MDEV

-

Utilities

IHF

-

MDEV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHF vs. MDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IHF
IHF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MDEV
MDEV Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IHF vs. MDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHFMDEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.04

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

0.13

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

0.29

+4.87

IHF vs. MDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the MDEV Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHF and MDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHF vs. MDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHF drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, which is greater than MDEV's maximum drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHF and MDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHFMDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.42%

-42.34%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.72%

-18.13%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.85%

-20.43%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.85%

-42.34%

+12.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-27.70%

+24.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-25.80%

+15.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.18%

8.45%

-1.27%

Volatility

IHF vs. MDEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) is 4.88%, while First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that IHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHFMDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

5.70%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

12.79%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.62%

16.63%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

19.12%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.04%

18.97%

+2.07%

IHF vs. MDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MDEV's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHF vs. MDEV - Dividend Comparison

IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than MDEV's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHF
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
0.93%1.05%0.86%0.79%0.74%0.56%0.53%0.58%4.01%0.19%0.25%0.20%
MDEV
First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF
0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHF and MDEV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDEV has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to IHF (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHF dropped -58.42% vs MDEV's -42.34%.

On 5-year performance, IHF leads with 1.81% vs -5.32% for MDEV. On fees, IHF is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IHF has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IHF has performed better with a 1.81% return vs -5.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IHF is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.

IHF has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.11% for MDEV.

IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Healthcare Providers Index, while MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHF and 0.70% for MDEV.

IHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHF and MDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer