IHF vs. MDEV
IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) and MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IHF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Healthcare Providers Index while MDEV tracks the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IHF returned 1.81%/yr vs -5.32%/yr for MDEV. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IHF charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for MDEV.
Performance
IHF vs. MDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHF achieves a 18.08% return, which is significantly higher than MDEV's -3.39% return.
IHF
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- YTD
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 39.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.83%
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 2.88%
- 3Y*
- -0.73%
- 5Y*
- -5.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.12M | $27.16M | $26.59M | |
| $145.15K | $110.14K | $63.91K |
IHF vs. MDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 18.08% | 0.92% | -7.90% | -1.11% | -7.11% | 9.68% |
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -3.39% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHF and MDEV is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021 | 0.54 |
The correlation between IHF and MDEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IHF vs. MDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHF
MDEV
Healthcare
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IHF
MDEV
Technology
IHF
MDEV
-
Financial Services
IHF
MDEV
-
Industrials
IHF
MDEV
-
Basic Materials
IHF
-
MDEV
-
Communication Services
IHF
-
MDEV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IHF
-
MDEV
-
Consumer Defensive
IHF
-
MDEV
-
Energy
IHF
-
MDEV
-
Real Estate
IHF
-
MDEV
-
Utilities
IHF
-
MDEV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHF vs. MDEV — Risk / Return Rank
IHF
MDEV
IHF vs. MDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHF | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.04 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 0.13 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 0.29 | +4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHF vs. MDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHF drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, which is greater than MDEV's maximum drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHF and MDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHF | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.42% | -42.34% | -16.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.72% | -18.13% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.85% | -20.43% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.85% | -42.34% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -27.70% | +24.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -25.80% | +15.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | 8.45% | -1.27% |
Volatility
IHF vs. MDEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) is 4.88%, while First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that IHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHF | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 5.70% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.93% | 12.79% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 16.63% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 19.12% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 18.97% | +2.07% |
IHF vs. MDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MDEV's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHF vs. MDEV - Dividend Comparison
IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than MDEV's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% |
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHF and MDEV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDEV has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to IHF (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHF dropped -58.42% vs MDEV's -42.34%.
On 5-year performance, IHF leads with 1.81% vs -5.32% for MDEV. On fees, IHF is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IHF has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IHF has performed better with a 1.81% return vs -5.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHF is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
IHF has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.11% for MDEV.
IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Healthcare Providers Index, while MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHF and 0.70% for MDEV.
IHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHF and MDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer