PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGV vs. SIXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGV vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -17.37% return, which is significantly lower than SIXH's 10.10% return.


IGV

1D
0.01%
1M
-7.10%
YTD
-17.37%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-17.89%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
15.70%

SIXH

1D
0.45%
1M
1.32%
YTD
10.10%
6M
10.25%
1Y
13.45%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGV vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
-17.37%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%12.30%39.21%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
10.10%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IGV and SIXH is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.19

The correlation between IGV and SIXH shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGV vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGV vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGVSIXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.31

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

3.09

-3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

7.85

-8.84

IGV vs. SIXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGV Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the SIXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGV and SIXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGV vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and SIXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGVSIXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-11.68%

-51.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.61%

-4.36%

-32.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.61%

-9.10%

-27.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.85%

-11.68%

-34.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.85%

-0.02%

-25.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.46%

-1.84%

-12.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.94%

1.72%

+16.22%

Volatility

IGV vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 12.71% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.29%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGVSIXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.71%

2.29%

+10.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.86%

6.08%

+18.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.27%

7.67%

+20.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.97%

10.37%

+17.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.38%

10.12%

+16.26%

IGV vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGV vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison

IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SIXH's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.85%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGV and SIXH have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGV has higher volatility (12.71%) compared to SIXH (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs SIXH's -11.68%.

On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 9.64% vs 2.37% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.

IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while SIXH is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGV and SIXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer