IGV vs. BUG
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) and BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGV tracks the S&P North American Technology-Software Index while BUG tracks the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGV returned 6.80%/yr vs 6.86%/yr for BUG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGV charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUG.
Performance
IGV vs. BUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than BUG's 20.72% return.
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
BUG
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 33.08%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
IGV vs. BUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 8.43% |
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 20.72% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and BUG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IGV and BUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGV vs. BUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
BUG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
BUG
Communication Services
IGV
BUG
Financial Services
IGV
BUG
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
BUG
Industrials
IGV
BUG
-
Basic Materials
IGV
-
BUG
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
BUG
Energy
IGV
-
BUG
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
BUG
Real Estate
IGV
-
BUG
-
Utilities
IGV
-
BUG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. BUG — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
BUG
IGV vs. BUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGV | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.04 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 0.08 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 0.16 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGV | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 0.09 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
IGV vs. BUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than BUG's maximum drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and BUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -41.66% | -21.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -37.69% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -37.69% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -41.66% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.93% | -4.62% | -10.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.44% | -14.42% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | 18.36% | -1.14% |
Volatility
IGV vs. BUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) is 11.63%, while Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that IGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 14.07% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 25.81% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 30.78% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 28.47% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 29.33% | -2.98% |
IGV vs. BUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BUG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. BUG - Dividend Comparison
IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and BUG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to IGV (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs BUG's -41.66%.
On 5-year performance, BUG leads with 6.86% vs 6.80% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 11.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUG has performed better with a 6.86% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.
BUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index, while BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGV and 0.50% for BUG.
BUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and BUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer