IGLD vs. GLL
IGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) and GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLD is a Gold fund actively managed by First Trust, while GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). IGLD is actively managed, while GLL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGLD returned 12.05%/yr vs -27.51%/yr for GLL. Their -0.93 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IGLD charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GLL.
Performance
IGLD vs. GLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLD achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than GLL's 1.26% return.
IGLD
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- -11.29%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 1Y
- 13.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.73%
GLL
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 23.22%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- -39.18%
- 3Y*
- -38.64%
- 5Y*
- -27.51%
- 10Y*
- -20.82%
- ALL TIME*
- -21.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.14M | $37.19M | $59.19M | |
| $4.93M | $5.43M | $7.10M |
IGLD vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | -6.86% | 47.46% | 19.36% | 9.24% | -2.34% | 4.30% |
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 1.26% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | -14.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLD and GLL is -0.96, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021 | -0.93 |
The correlation between IGLD and GLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.96 to -0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLD vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank
IGLD
GLL
IGLD vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGLD | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.89 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | -0.61 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | -0.89 | +2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGLD vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLD drawdown since its inception was -23.84%, smaller than the maximum GLL drawdown of -99.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD and GLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLD | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.84% | -99.24% | +75.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.84% | -64.23% | +40.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.84% | -87.95% | +64.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.84% | -89.76% | +65.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.29% | -98.74% | +76.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -85.24% | +79.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.65% | 44.13% | -33.48% |
Volatility
IGLD vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) is 5.32%, while ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a volatility of 11.92%. This indicates that IGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLD | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 11.92% | -6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.82% | 41.51% | -20.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.12% | 55.36% | -30.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 36.89% | -21.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 32.49% | -17.06% |
IGLD vs. GLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GLL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGLD vs. GLL - Dividend Comparison
IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.29%, while GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 23.29% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLD and GLL have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLL has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to IGLD (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLD dropped -23.84% vs GLL's -99.24%.
On 5-year performance, IGLD leads with 12.05% vs -27.51% for GLL. On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 12.05% return vs -27.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLL.
IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 23.29%, compared with 0.00% for GLL.
IGLD is categorized as Gold, while GLL is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IGLD and 0.95% for GLL.
IGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGLD and GLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer