IGF vs. RBIL
IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net), while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IGF returned 18.50% vs 3.95% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
IGF vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.31% return.
IGF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 18.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGF vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.70% | 18.34% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.31% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and RBIL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
RBIL
IGF vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGF | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 2.06 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 7.59 | -4.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.98 | 44.07 | -35.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGF vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -0.52% | -57.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -0.52% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -0.51% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.85% | -0.07% | -11.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 0.09% | +1.97% |
Volatility
IGF vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that IGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 0.36% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 0.85% | +7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 0.95% | +9.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 1.07% | +12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 1.07% | +15.75% |
IGF vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGF vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.91% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.38% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGF and RBIL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGF has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs RBIL's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, IGF leads with 18.50% vs 3.95% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IGF has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.91% for IGF.
IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net), while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGF and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer