IGF vs. IDV
IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGF returned 8.67%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for IDV. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.
Performance
IGF vs. IDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than IDV's 13.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed IDV with an annualized return of 8.67%, while IDV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return.
IGF
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 16.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
IDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 35.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
IGF vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.68% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 13.60% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and IDV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IGF and IDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGF vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGF
IDV
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
IGF
IDV
Industrials
IGF
IDV
Energy
IGF
IDV
Real Estate
IGF
IDV
Basic Materials
IGF
-
IDV
Communication Services
IGF
-
IDV
Consumer Cyclical
IGF
-
IDV
Consumer Defensive
IGF
-
IDV
Financial Services
IGF
-
IDV
Healthcare
IGF
-
IDV
-
Technology
IGF
-
IDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
IDV
IGF vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGF | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.49 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 4.13 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 15.32 | -7.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGF vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and IDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -70.14% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -8.52% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -11.86% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -29.19% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | -42.50% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -1.70% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.86% | -15.38% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.30% | -0.26% |
Volatility
IGF vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 3.85%, while iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 4.24% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 10.88% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 13.10% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 15.58% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 17.92% | -1.09% |
IGF vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGF vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than IDV's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.40% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.94% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGF and IDV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDV has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to IGF (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs IDV's -70.14%.
On 10-year performance, IDV leads with 10.92% vs 8.67% for IGF. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDV has performed better with a 10.92% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 2.94% for IGF.
IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IDV is Global Equities. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.49% for IDV.
IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGF and IDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer