PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFV vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFV vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IFV has underperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 7.10%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.13% annualized return.


IFV

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.11%
YTD
12.94%
6M
16.30%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
7.10%

NFTY

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
-9.70%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFV vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
12.94%32.26%0.33%20.45%-25.39%5.59%6.15%26.29%-20.44%32.58%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-9.70%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IFV and NFTY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014

0.46

The correlation between IFV and NFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

IFV vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFV
NFTY

Industrials

31.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
21.2%

Basic Materials

10.3%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
16.3%

Energy

8.5%
8.5%

Technology

7.5%
9.2%

Real Estate

6.1%

-

Utilities

5.4%
4.0%

Healthcare

4.0%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
8.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.0%

Industrials

IFV
31.1%
NFTY
8.3%

Financial Services

IFV
11.6%
NFTY
21.2%

Basic Materials

IFV
10.3%
NFTY
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IFV
9.3%
NFTY
16.3%

Energy

IFV
8.5%
NFTY
8.5%

Technology

IFV
7.5%
NFTY
9.2%

Real Estate

IFV
6.1%
NFTY

-

Utilities

IFV
5.4%
NFTY
4.0%

Healthcare

IFV
4.0%
NFTY
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

IFV
3.9%
NFTY
8.3%

Communication Services

IFV
2.6%
NFTY
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFV vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFV
IFV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFV vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFVNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.91

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

-0.53

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

-1.39

+10.36

IFV vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFV and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFVNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

-0.58

+2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.27

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.39

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.28

-0.04

Drawdowns

IFV vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, roughly equal to the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFVNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-47.67%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-16.14%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-21.55%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.32%

-21.55%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-47.67%

-1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-17.45%

+16.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-9.58%

-3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

6.12%

-2.80%

Volatility

IFV vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.58%. This indicates that IFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFVNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

4.58%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

12.57%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

14.72%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

17.39%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

20.72%

+0.03%

IFV vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFV vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than NFTY's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
1.76%1.95%2.31%2.88%3.79%1.04%1.53%2.91%1.86%1.43%1.10%1.52%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.96%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFV and NFTY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFV has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to NFTY (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, NFTY leads with 8.13% vs 7.10% for IFV. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 8.13% return vs 7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.76% for IFV.

IFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.80% for NFTY.

IFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFV and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer