PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFLR vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFLR vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.


IFLR

1D
-0.67%
1M
0.02%
6M
3.30%
YTD
6.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
-3.68%
1M
-13.79%
6M
25.01%
YTD
35.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and POW is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFLR vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IFLR vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFLRPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-20.28%

+10.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-20.28%

+18.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-4.56%

+1.95%

Volatility

IFLR vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFLRPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

33.06%

-19.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.31%

33.06%

-19.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.31%

33.06%

-19.75%

IFLR vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFLR vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IFLR and POW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.

IFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFLR and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer