IFLR vs. HERD
IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IFLR is actively managed, while HERD is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
IFLR vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 12.05% return.
IFLR
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HERD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
IFLR vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 4.93% | 4.20% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 12.05% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLR and HERD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.75 |
IFLR vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLR
HERD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IFLR
HERD
Industrials
IFLR
HERD
Technology
IFLR
HERD
Healthcare
IFLR
HERD
Consumer Cyclical
IFLR
HERD
Consumer Defensive
IFLR
HERD
Basic Materials
IFLR
HERD
Communication Services
IFLR
HERD
Energy
IFLR
HERD
Utilities
IFLR
HERD
Real Estate
IFLR
HERD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLR vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
IFLR
HERD
IFLR vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFLR | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.63 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
IFLR vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLR | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -39.41% | +29.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -0.67% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -4.55% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.66% | — |
Volatility
IFLR vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLR | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.07% | 11.62% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 17.76% | -4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 20.50% | -7.43% |
IFLR vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLR vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than HERD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 3.13% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% |
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLR and HERD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HERD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HERD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.73% for HERD.
Find the right allocation for IFLR and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer