IESC vs. GSIB
IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) is Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. Over the past year, IESC returned 166.54% vs 42.41% for GSIB. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IESC vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 86.22% return, which is significantly higher than GSIB's 9.75% return.
IESC
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- 15.65%
- YTD
- 86.22%
- 6M
- 72.76%
- 1Y
- 166.54%
- 3Y*
- 142.30%
- 5Y*
- 67.69%
- 10Y*
- 47.29%
GSIB
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- 1Y
- 42.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IESC vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 86.22% | 93.58% | 153.67% | -5.59% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 9.75% | 61.67% | 32.86% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESC and GSIB is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESC vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank
IESC
GSIB
IESC vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IESC | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.41 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.69 | 3.07 | +4.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.83 | 10.80 | +11.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IESC | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.47 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 2.35 | -2.30 |
Drawdowns
IESC vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and GSIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESC | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.32% | -17.71% | -80.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.80% | -13.90% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.07% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -2.06% | -52.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 3.94% | +3.72% |
Volatility
IESC vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison
IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 12.25% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 5.26%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESC | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.25% | 5.26% | +6.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.68% | 13.97% | +35.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.92% | 17.24% | +44.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.91% | 18.45% | +35.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.10% | 18.45% | +29.65% |
Dividends
IESC vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison
IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.74% | 1.91% | 1.67% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IESC and GSIB have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IESC has higher volatility (12.25%) compared to GSIB (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs GSIB's -17.71%.
IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IESC and GSIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer