PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEO vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEO vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEO achieves a 34.59% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 50.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IEO has outperformed XES with an annualized return of 10.42%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -2.47% annualized return.


IEO

1D
1.66%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
34.59%
6M
26.42%
1Y
40.11%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
18.96%
10Y*
10.42%

XES

1D
-0.56%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
50.69%
6M
43.67%
1Y
97.14%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
-2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEO vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
34.59%2.15%-1.45%3.57%57.82%75.57%-32.77%9.63%-19.44%0.33%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
50.69%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IEO and XES is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.86

The correlation between IEO and XES shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEO vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEO
XES

Energy

99.3%
97.5%

Basic Materials

0.7%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

IEO
99.3%
XES
97.5%

Basic Materials

IEO
0.7%
XES

-

Communication Services

IEO

-

XES

-

Consumer Cyclical

IEO

-

XES

-

Consumer Defensive

IEO

-

XES

-

Financial Services

IEO

-

XES

-

Healthcare

IEO

-

XES

-

Industrials

IEO

-

XES
2.5%

Real Estate

IEO

-

XES

-

Technology

IEO

-

XES

-

Utilities

IEO

-

XES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEO vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEO
IEO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEO vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEOXESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.48

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

9.93

-7.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

26.79

-19.16

IEO vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the XES Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEO and XES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEOXESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

3.23

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.35

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

-0.05

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.07

+0.24

Drawdowns

IEO vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEO drawdown since its inception was -79.17%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEO and XES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEOXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.17%

-95.65%

+16.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-9.84%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.46%

-45.95%

+14.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.46%

-45.95%

+14.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.00%

-91.23%

+16.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-70.90%

+63.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.27%

-54.36%

+28.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

3.64%

+1.64%

Volatility

IEO vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) at 8.22%. This indicates that IEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEOXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

8.22%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.86%

20.52%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.15%

30.50%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.54%

39.04%

-8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.00%

45.04%

-10.04%

IEO vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEO vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

IEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than XES's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.97%2.61%2.63%3.00%3.77%2.62%3.17%1.85%1.67%0.94%0.98%2.03%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.12%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEO and XES have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEO has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to XES (8.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEO dropped -79.17% vs XES's -95.65%.

On 10-year performance, IEO leads with 10.42% vs -2.47% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XES has been the lower-risk option at 8.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEO has performed better with a 10.42% return vs -2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IEO.

IEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.12% for XES.

IEO tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Exploration & Production Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IEO and 0.35% for XES.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEO and XES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer