IEFA vs. LRGF
IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and LRGF (iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while LRGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFA returned 9.38%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for LRGF. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LRGF.
Performance
IEFA vs. LRGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than LRGF's 8.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed LRGF with an annualized return of 9.38%, while LRGF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.38%
LRGF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 15.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $895.79M | $960.37M | $950.39M | |
| $11.35M | $13.93M | $11.55M |
IEFA vs. LRGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 9.45% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 26.57% |
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 8.94% | 16.48% | 26.59% | 25.85% | -14.77% | 25.01% | 11.11% | 26.11% | -9.66% | 21.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFA and LRGF is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015 | 0.75 |
The correlation between IEFA and LRGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEFA vs. LRGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFA
LRGF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFA
LRGF
Industrials
IEFA
LRGF
Technology
IEFA
LRGF
Healthcare
IEFA
LRGF
Consumer Cyclical
IEFA
LRGF
Consumer Defensive
IEFA
LRGF
Basic Materials
IEFA
LRGF
Energy
IEFA
LRGF
Utilities
IEFA
LRGF
Communication Services
IEFA
LRGF
Real Estate
IEFA
LRGF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFA vs. LRGF — Risk / Return Rank
IEFA
LRGF
IEFA vs. LRGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEFA | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.78 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 6.95 | -1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEFA vs. LRGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, roughly equal to the maximum LRGF drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and LRGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFA | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -36.03% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -8.92% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.76% | -19.44% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -21.62% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.78% | -36.03% | +1.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -2.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -4.51% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.28% | +0.74% |
Volatility
IEFA vs. LRGF - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) at 2.90%. This indicates that IEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFA | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 2.90% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 9.83% | +3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 12.69% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 17.07% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 18.28% | -1.26% |
IEFA vs. LRGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LRGF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEFA vs. LRGF - Dividend Comparison
IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than LRGF's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.41% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEFA and LRGF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEFA has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to LRGF (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs LRGF's -36.03%.
On 10-year performance, LRGF leads with 13.48% vs 9.38% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, LRGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LRGF has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LRGF.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 1.09% for LRGF.
IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LRGF is Large Cap Blend Equities. IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while LRGF tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.20% for LRGF.
LRGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEFA and LRGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer