IEFA vs. DBEF
IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while DBEF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFA returned 9.37%/yr vs 12.28%/yr for DBEF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for DBEF.
Performance
IEFA vs. DBEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than DBEF's 9.52% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed DBEF with an annualized return of 9.37%, while DBEF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
DBEF
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
IEFA vs. DBEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 7.49% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 26.57% |
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 9.52% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFA and DBEF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IEFA and DBEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEFA vs. DBEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFA
DBEF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFA
DBEF
Industrials
IEFA
DBEF
Technology
IEFA
DBEF
Healthcare
IEFA
DBEF
Consumer Cyclical
IEFA
DBEF
Basic Materials
IEFA
DBEF
Consumer Defensive
IEFA
DBEF
Communication Services
IEFA
DBEF
Energy
IEFA
DBEF
Utilities
IEFA
DBEF
Real Estate
IEFA
DBEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFA vs. DBEF — Risk / Return Rank
IEFA
DBEF
IEFA vs. DBEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEFA | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 2.44 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 10.24 | -3.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEFA | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.83 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.95 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.78 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
IEFA vs. DBEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, which is greater than DBEF's maximum drawdown of -32.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and DBEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFA | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -32.46% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -9.41% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.76% | -14.62% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -14.95% | -15.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.78% | -32.46% | -2.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -1.26% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -4.73% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.24% | +0.78% |
Volatility
IEFA vs. DBEF - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) at 3.60%. This indicates that IEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFA | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.60% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.74% | 10.41% | +2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 12.59% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 13.78% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 15.81% | +1.51% |
IEFA vs. DBEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEF's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEFA vs. DBEF - Dividend Comparison
IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than DBEF's 5.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 5.07% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.30% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEFA and DBEF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEFA has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DBEF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs DBEF's -32.46%.
On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.28% vs 9.37% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.28% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for DBEF.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 3.30% for IEFA.
IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBEF is Hedge Fund. IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.36% for DBEF.
DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEFA and DBEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer