IDX vs. FLKR
IDX (VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IDX tracks the MVIS Indonesia Index while FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDX returned -9.23%/yr vs 18.41%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
IDX vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -36.77% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 104.96% return.
IDX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -21.09%
- YTD
- -36.77%
- 6M
- -37.78%
- 1Y
- -27.09%
- 3Y*
- -14.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.23%
- 10Y*
- -4.45%
FLKR
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- 16.33%
- YTD
- 104.96%
- 6M
- 121.64%
- 1Y
- 213.10%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- —
IDX vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | -36.77% | 13.83% | -9.75% | 1.98% | -9.40% | -2.59% | -7.45% | 6.26% | -10.46% | 4.14% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 104.96% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDX and FLKR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IDX and FLKR has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IDX vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDX
FLKR
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
IDX
FLKR
Financial Services
IDX
FLKR
Energy
IDX
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
IDX
FLKR
Communication Services
IDX
FLKR
Industrials
IDX
FLKR
Utilities
IDX
FLKR
Technology
IDX
FLKR
Healthcare
IDX
FLKR
Real Estate
IDX
FLKR
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDX
FLKR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDX vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
IDX
FLKR
IDX vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDX | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.67 | -0.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 9.32 | -10.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.07 | 34.49 | -36.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDX | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.08 | 5.18 | -6.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | 0.65 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.53 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
IDX vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDX | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -50.06% | -13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.41% | -23.03% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.82% | -26.39% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.77% | -49.51% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.11% | -6.10% | -51.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.83% | -22.06% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.07% | 6.21% | +6.86% |
Volatility
IDX vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) is 8.31%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.38%. This indicates that IDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDX | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 20.38% | -12.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.03% | 36.87% | -14.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.08% | 41.48% | -16.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 28.25% | -7.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 27.60% | -3.29% |
IDX vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDX vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than FLKR's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.89% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | 3.29% | 2.08% | 4.01% | 3.62% | 3.64% | 1.08% | 1.66% | 2.21% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.16% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDX and FLKR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.38%) compared to IDX (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 18.41% vs -9.23% for IDX. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IDX has been the lower-risk option at 8.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 18.41% return vs -9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for IDX.
IDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.89% for FLKR.
IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.09% for FLKR.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDX and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer