IDX vs. ASEA
IDX (VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF) and ASEA (Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IDX tracks the MVIS Indonesia Index while ASEA tracks the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDX returned -4.14%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for ASEA. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASEA.
Performance
IDX vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -36.83% return, which is significantly lower than ASEA's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, IDX has underperformed ASEA with an annualized return of -4.14%, while ASEA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.78% annualized return.
IDX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -36.83%
- 6M
- -37.32%
- 1Y
- -24.87%
- 3Y*
- -13.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.11%
- 10Y*
- -4.14%
ASEA
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 26.15%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
IDX vs. ASEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | -36.83% | 13.83% | -9.75% | 1.98% | -9.40% | -2.59% | -7.45% | 6.26% | -10.46% | 19.24% |
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 8.63% | 19.80% | 9.82% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 4.66% | -7.88% | 8.34% | -7.58% | 35.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDX and ASEA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IDX and ASEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDX vs. ASEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDX
ASEA
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Technology
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
IDX
ASEA
Basic Materials
IDX
ASEA
Consumer Defensive
IDX
ASEA
Communication Services
IDX
ASEA
Energy
IDX
ASEA
Consumer Cyclical
IDX
ASEA
Utilities
IDX
ASEA
Technology
IDX
ASEA
-
Healthcare
IDX
ASEA
Real Estate
IDX
ASEA
Industrials
IDX
ASEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDX vs. ASEA — Risk / Return Rank
IDX
ASEA
IDX vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDX | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.33 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.17 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.57 | 8.47 | -10.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDX vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than ASEA's maximum drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and ASEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDX | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -44.16% | -18.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.52% | -8.28% | -36.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.73% | -22.20% | -24.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.25% | -22.20% | -29.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.11% | -44.16% | -14.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.15% | -3.58% | -53.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.93% | -10.63% | -14.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.87% | 3.09% | +12.78% |
Volatility
IDX vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 4.56%. This indicates that IDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDX | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | 4.56% | +9.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.27% | 11.52% | +13.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.63% | 14.34% | +13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 14.73% | +6.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 17.53% | +6.97% |
IDX vs. ASEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than ASEA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDX vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison
IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than ASEA's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 3.64% | 3.95% | 3.61% | 3.76% | 2.23% | 4.19% | 2.27% | 2.51% | 3.08% | 1.59% | 2.78% | 3.64% |
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | 3.30% | 2.08% | 4.01% | 3.62% | 3.64% | 1.08% | 1.66% | 2.21% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.16% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDX and ASEA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDX has higher volatility (13.95%) compared to ASEA (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs ASEA's -44.16%.
On 10-year performance, ASEA leads with 7.78% vs -4.14% for IDX. On fees, IDX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ASEA has performed better with a 7.78% return vs -4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASEA.
ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 3.30% for IDX.
IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.65% for ASEA.
ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDX and ASEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer