PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDVZ vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IDVZ vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IDVZ vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IDVZ
Opal International Dividend Income ETF
6.35%33.14%-1.61%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
10.06%46.83%-0.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDVZ achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 10.06% return.


IDVZ

1D
2.06%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
6.35%
6M
10.47%
1Y
26.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EFAS

1D
2.54%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
10.06%
6M
15.25%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IDVZ vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IDVZ vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDVZ
IDVZ Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IDVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVZ vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDVZEFASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

2.83

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

3.51

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.56

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.73

-1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.59

17.19

-6.60

IDVZ vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVZ and EFAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDVZEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.83

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.09

0.55

+1.53

Correlation

The correlation between IDVZ and EFAS is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IDVZ vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

IDVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than EFAS's 4.54% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IDVZ
Opal International Dividend Income ETF
2.83%2.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.54%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%

Drawdowns

IDVZ vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVZ drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVZ and EFAS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IDVZEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-44.38%

+33.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-10.52%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-1.59%

-3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-7.20%

+5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.28%

+0.19%

Volatility

IDVZ vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 5.52%. This indicates that IDVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IDVZEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

5.52%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

8.29%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

14.22%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

15.68%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

18.45%

-3.75%