PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDLV vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDLV vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IDLV has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 5.73%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.


IDLV

1D
0.15%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
3.29%
6M
2.89%
1Y
9.61%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
5.73%

RSP

1D
0.71%
1M
2.23%
YTD
10.72%
6M
9.45%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDLV vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
3.29%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%20.09%-8.02%22.01%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
10.72%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between IDLV and RSP is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2012

0.70

The correlation between IDLV and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDLV vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDLV
RSP

Financial Services

23.3%
13.9%

Industrials

16.7%
14.2%

Real Estate

14.9%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
6.4%

Utilities

11.2%
5.7%

Communication Services

8.7%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
10.0%

Energy

3.6%
4.0%

Basic Materials

2.4%
3.9%

Healthcare

1.7%
11.1%

Technology

0.7%
20.9%

Financial Services

IDLV
23.3%
RSP
13.9%

Industrials

IDLV
16.7%
RSP
14.2%

Real Estate

IDLV
14.9%
RSP
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDLV
13.8%
RSP
6.4%

Utilities

IDLV
11.2%
RSP
5.7%

Communication Services

IDLV
8.7%
RSP
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IDLV
3.7%
RSP
10.0%

Energy

IDLV
3.6%
RSP
4.0%

Basic Materials

IDLV
2.4%
RSP
3.9%

Healthcare

IDLV
1.7%
RSP
11.1%

Technology

IDLV
0.7%
RSP
20.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDLV vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDLV vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDLVRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.39

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.44

9.03

-5.59

IDLV vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDLV and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDLV vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDLVRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-59.92%

+25.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-7.85%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

-17.81%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-21.38%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.65%

-39.04%

+4.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-0.79%

-4.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-6.64%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.08%

+0.72%

Volatility

IDLV vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) is 2.64%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that IDLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDLVRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.59%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

8.69%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

11.81%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.78%

16.20%

-4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

18.33%

-5.11%

IDLV vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDLV vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than RSP's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
5.08%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.52%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDLV and RSP have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSP has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to IDLV (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 12.31% vs 5.73% for IDLV. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 12.31% return vs 5.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDLV.

IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 1.52% for RSP.

IDLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while RSP is S&P 500. IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDLV and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer