IDLV vs. QLVD
IDLV (Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF) and QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - IDLV tracks the S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index while QLVD tracks the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDLV returned 6.16%/yr vs 6.14%/yr for QLVD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QLVD.
Performance
IDLV vs. QLVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than QLVD's 3.37% return.
IDLV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 8.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
QLVD
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 3.37%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- —
IDLV vs. QLVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 2.61% | 27.77% | 2.15% | 9.18% | -12.21% | 9.76% | -9.78% | 4.07% |
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 3.37% | 24.21% | 4.67% | 11.57% | -12.09% | 9.04% | 3.00% | 6.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDLV and QLVD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IDLV and QLVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDLV vs. QLVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDLV
QLVD
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
IDLV
QLVD
Industrials
IDLV
QLVD
Real Estate
IDLV
QLVD
Consumer Defensive
IDLV
QLVD
Utilities
IDLV
QLVD
Communication Services
IDLV
QLVD
Consumer Cyclical
IDLV
QLVD
Energy
IDLV
QLVD
Basic Materials
IDLV
QLVD
Healthcare
IDLV
QLVD
Technology
IDLV
QLVD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDLV vs. QLVD — Risk / Return Rank
IDLV
QLVD
IDLV vs. QLVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDLV | QLVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.71 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.07 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.13 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.06 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 3.18 | +0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDLV | QLVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.71 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.49 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
IDLV vs. QLVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than QLVD's maximum drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and QLVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDLV | QLVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -28.20% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | -8.15% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.97% | -9.24% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.52% | -23.99% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.70% | -5.55% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -5.24% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.71% | -0.19% |
Volatility
IDLV vs. QLVD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) is 2.86%, while FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that IDLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDLV | QLVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 3.19% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 8.26% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.83% | 10.55% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 11.73% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 13.98% | -0.58% |
IDLV vs. QLVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QLVD's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDLV vs. QLVD - Dividend Comparison
IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than QLVD's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 4.70% | 4.63% | 3.41% | 3.59% | 4.69% | 2.99% | 2.30% | 4.92% | 3.94% | 3.05% | 3.92% | 3.93% |
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.76% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 3.06% | 1.78% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDLV and QLVD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVD has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to IDLV (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs QLVD's -28.20%.
On 5-year performance, IDLV leads with 6.16% vs 6.14% for QLVD. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDLV has performed better with a 6.16% return vs 6.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.
IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 2.76% for QLVD.
IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index, while QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.32% for QLVD.
IDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDLV and QLVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer