PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDLV vs. QLVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDLV vs. QLVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than QLVD's 3.37% return.


IDLV

1D
0.03%
1M
-2.80%
YTD
2.61%
6M
4.64%
1Y
8.77%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
5.15%

QLVD

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
3.37%
6M
5.73%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
11.86%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDLV vs. QLVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
2.61%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%4.07%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
3.37%24.21%4.67%11.57%-12.09%9.04%3.00%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between IDLV and QLVD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.91

The correlation between IDLV and QLVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDLV vs. QLVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDLV
QLVD

Financial Services

22.9%
24.3%

Industrials

16.4%
15.3%

Real Estate

15.4%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
11.3%

Utilities

11.4%
7.9%

Communication Services

8.6%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
5.5%

Energy

3.6%
3.9%

Basic Materials

2.3%
4.3%

Healthcare

1.7%
10.6%

Technology

0.7%
5.0%

Financial Services

IDLV
22.9%
QLVD
24.3%

Industrials

IDLV
16.4%
QLVD
15.3%

Real Estate

IDLV
15.4%
QLVD
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

IDLV
13.8%
QLVD
11.3%

Utilities

IDLV
11.4%
QLVD
7.9%

Communication Services

IDLV
8.6%
QLVD
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IDLV
3.8%
QLVD
5.5%

Energy

IDLV
3.6%
QLVD
3.9%

Basic Materials

IDLV
2.3%
QLVD
4.3%

Healthcare

IDLV
1.7%
QLVD
10.6%

Technology

IDLV
0.7%
QLVD
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDLV vs. QLVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

QLVD
QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDLV vs. QLVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDLVQLVDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

0.71

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

1.07

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.06

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.90

3.18

+0.72

IDLV vs. QLVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the QLVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDLV and QLVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDLVQLVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.71

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.53

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Drawdowns

IDLV vs. QLVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than QLVD's maximum drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and QLVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDLVQLVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-28.20%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-8.15%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

-9.24%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-23.99%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.70%

-5.55%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-5.24%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.71%

-0.19%

Volatility

IDLV vs. QLVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) is 2.86%, while FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that IDLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDLVQLVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

3.19%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

8.26%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

10.55%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.80%

11.73%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.40%

13.98%

-0.58%

IDLV vs. QLVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QLVD's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDLV vs. QLVD - Dividend Comparison

IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than QLVD's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
4.70%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.76%2.87%3.01%3.33%2.47%3.06%1.78%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDLV and QLVD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVD has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to IDLV (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs QLVD's -28.20%.

On 5-year performance, IDLV leads with 6.16% vs 6.14% for QLVD. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDLV has performed better with a 6.16% return vs 6.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.

IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 2.76% for QLVD.

IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index, while QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.32% for QLVD.

IDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDLV and QLVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer