IDLV vs. LVHI
IDLV (Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF) and LVHI (Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - IDLV tracks the S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index while LVHI tracks the QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDLV returned 6.16%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for LVHI. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
IDLV vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.90% return.
IDLV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 8.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 15.87%
- 10Y*
- —
IDLV vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 2.61% | 27.77% | 2.15% | 9.18% | -12.21% | 9.76% | -9.78% | 20.09% | -8.02% | 22.01% |
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 11.90% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDLV and LVHI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between IDLV and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDLV vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDLV
LVHI
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
IDLV
LVHI
Industrials
IDLV
LVHI
Real Estate
IDLV
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
IDLV
LVHI
Utilities
IDLV
LVHI
Communication Services
IDLV
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
IDLV
LVHI
Energy
IDLV
LVHI
Basic Materials
IDLV
LVHI
Healthcare
IDLV
LVHI
Technology
IDLV
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDLV vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
IDLV
LVHI
IDLV vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDLV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 3.18 | -2.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 4.36 | -3.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.60 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 5.01 | -3.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 20.95 | -17.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDLV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 3.18 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.44 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.82 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
IDLV vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDLV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -32.31% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | -6.08% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.97% | -11.99% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.52% | -11.99% | -10.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.70% | -1.39% | -4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -3.52% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 1.45% | +1.07% |
Volatility
IDLV vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) is 2.86%, while Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that IDLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDLV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 3.30% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 7.51% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.83% | 9.45% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 11.06% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 13.76% | -0.36% |
IDLV vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDLV vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than LVHI's 4.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 4.70% | 4.63% | 3.41% | 3.59% | 4.69% | 2.99% | 2.30% | 4.92% | 3.94% | 3.05% | 3.92% | 3.93% |
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 4.49% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDLV and LVHI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to IDLV (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.87% vs 6.16% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 6.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 4.49% for LVHI.
IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index, while LVHI tracks QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDLV and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer