IDLV vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IDLV (Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. IDLV is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, IDLV returned 12.63% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. IDLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

IDLV vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.52% return.

IDLV

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: 6.38%
• YTD: 6.89%
• 1Y: 12.63%
• 3Y*: 12.80%
• 5Y*: 6.79%
• 10Y*: 5.48%

MSTZ

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 38.88%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: -27.52%
• 1Y: 299.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDLV vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF	6.89%	27.77%	-7.77%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.52%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IDLV and MSTZ is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.22

Return for Risk

IDLV vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDLV

IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 42
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 35

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDLV vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDLV	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.03	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.49	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	3.55	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	6.84	-2.49

IDLV vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDLV and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDLV vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDLV	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.65%	-99.38%	+64.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.54%	-84.89%	+77.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-97.53%	+95.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-94.55%	+88.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	43.95%	-41.04%

Volatility

IDLV vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) is 2.25%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that IDLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDLV	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.25%	55.03%	-52.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.91%	134.45%	-126.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.79%	148.58%	-138.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.77%	170.73%	-158.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	170.73%	-157.59%

IDLV vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDLV vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF	4.91%	4.63%	3.41%	3.59%	4.69%	2.99%	2.30%	4.92%	3.94%	3.05%	3.92%	3.93%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDLV and MSTZ in my portfolio?

IDLV and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDLV or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to IDLV (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, IDLV or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs 12.63% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDLV or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDLV or MSTZ?

IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDLV or MSTZ?

IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between IDLV and MSTZ?

IDLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.