IDEV vs. EFAS
IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IDEV tracks the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index while EFAS tracks the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDEV returned 8.88%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for EFAS. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDEV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.
Performance
IDEV vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEV achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 13.61% return.
IDEV
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 13.61%
- 6M
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
IDEV vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 9.92% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -14.10% | 17.29% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 13.61% | 46.83% | 3.07% | 14.65% | -8.00% | 12.75% | -5.42% | 14.60% | -11.60% | 17.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEV and EFAS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between IDEV and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDEV vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDEV
EFAS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IDEV
EFAS
Industrials
IDEV
EFAS
Technology
IDEV
EFAS
Healthcare
IDEV
EFAS
Basic Materials
IDEV
EFAS
Consumer Cyclical
IDEV
EFAS
Consumer Defensive
IDEV
EFAS
Energy
IDEV
EFAS
Communication Services
IDEV
EFAS
Utilities
IDEV
EFAS
Real Estate
IDEV
EFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEV vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
IDEV
EFAS
IDEV vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDEV | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 2.70 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 3.79 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.47 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 5.72 | -3.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.73 | 15.34 | -6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDEV | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.70 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.79 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IDEV vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEV drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEV and EFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEV | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.77% | -44.38% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -5.30% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -11.84% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.15% | -28.81% | -0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -2.45% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -7.08% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 1.98% | +0.87% |
Volatility
IDEV vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.08%. This indicates that IDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEV | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 3.08% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 8.17% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 10.67% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 15.59% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 18.33% | -1.06% |
IDEV vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDEV vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
IDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than EFAS's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.59% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.10% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEV and EFAS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDEV has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to EFAS (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEV dropped -34.77% vs EFAS's -44.38%.
On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.25% vs 8.88% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 3.10% for IDEV.
IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IDEV and 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDEV and EFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer