PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEC vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEC vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEC achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 111.33% return.


IDEC

1D
0.13%
1M
1.47%
YTD
6.70%
6M
6.94%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
2.03%
1M
13.75%
YTD
111.33%
6M
112.18%
1Y
221.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEC vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IDEC
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December
6.70%21.78%2.50%3.27%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
111.33%53.93%-17.00%14.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEC and AMDY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEC vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEC
IDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEC vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDECAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.56

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

8.07

-5.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

18.01

-7.79

IDEC vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEC and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDEC vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEC drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEC and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDECAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-53.92%

+45.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-27.59%

+20.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-17.79%

+16.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

12.34%

-10.66%

Volatility

IDEC vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) is 2.84%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.60%. This indicates that IDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDECAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

20.60%

-17.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

43.29%

-35.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.88%

56.05%

-47.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.69%

46.87%

-37.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.69%

46.87%

-37.18%

IDEC vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEC vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

IDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.77%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
62.77%80.68%109.98%6.68%
IDEC
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDEC and AMDY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.60%) compared to IDEC (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEC dropped -8.51% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 221.30% vs 17.13% for IDEC. On fees, IDEC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 221.30% return vs 17.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 62.77%, compared with 0.00% for IDEC.

IDEC is categorized as Options Trading, while AMDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IDEC and 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEC and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer