PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEC vs. IVVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEC vs. IVVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEC achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly higher than IVVB's 4.99% return.


IDEC

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.13%
6M
4.80%
YTD
7.83%
1Y
17.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.16%

IVVB

1D
0.62%
1M
0.35%
6M
3.77%
YTD
4.99%
1Y
12.56%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$59.29K$40.98K$55.83K
$448.03K$518.51K$884.48K

IDEC vs. IVVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IDEC
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December
7.83%21.78%2.50%3.27%
IVVB
iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF
4.99%9.60%18.66%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEC and IVVB is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

0.67

The correlation between IDEC and IVVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEC vs. IVVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDEC
IDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IVVB
IVVB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IVVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDEC vs. IVVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDECIVVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.01

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

8.40

+1.84

IDEC vs. IVVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the IVVB Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEC and IVVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDEC vs. IVVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEC drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum IVVB drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEC and IVVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDECIVVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-13.08%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-5.75%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.52%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-1.55%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.37%

+0.30%

Volatility

IDEC vs. IVVB - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) at 2.39%. This indicates that IDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDECIVVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.39%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

5.46%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.12%

7.70%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.68%

9.19%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.68%

9.19%

+0.49%

IDEC vs. IVVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVB's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEC vs. IVVB - Dividend Comparison

IDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IDEC and IVVB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDEC has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to IVVB (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEC dropped -8.51% vs IVVB's -13.08%.

On 1-year performance, IDEC leads with 17.21% vs 12.56% for IVVB. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IVVB has been the lower-risk option at 2.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IDEC has performed better with a 17.21% return vs 12.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IDEC.

IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for IDEC.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IDEC and 0.50% for IVVB.

IDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEC and IVVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer