IDEC vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IDEC (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. IDEC is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, IDEC returned 17.13% vs 43.43% for FFTY. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

IDEC vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEC achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 26.26% return.

IDEC

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 6.94%
• 1Y: 17.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFTY

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: 10.03%
• YTD: 26.26%
• 6M: 22.29%
• 1Y: 43.43%
• 3Y*: 23.01%
• 5Y*: 0.68%
• 10Y*: 8.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEC vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IDEC Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December	6.70%	21.78%	2.50%	3.27%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	26.26%	23.38%	18.36%	4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEC and FFTY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023	0.55

The correlation between IDEC and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IDEC vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEC

IDEC Risk / Return Rank: 60
IDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
IDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 35
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEC vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDEC	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.22	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	1.65	+1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.22	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	1.87	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.22	4.94	+5.28

IDEC vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEC and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDEC vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEC drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEC and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDEC	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.51%	-59.46%	+50.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.87%	-23.29%	+16.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.01%	+11.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.52%	-22.34%	+20.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	8.81%	-7.13%

Volatility

IDEC vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) is 2.84%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that IDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDEC	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	12.58%	-9.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.78%	28.19%	-20.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.88%	35.80%	-26.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.69%	29.57%	-19.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.69%	27.65%	-17.96%

IDEC vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDEC vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

IDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	1.07%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%
IDEC Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDEC and FFTY in my portfolio?

IDEC and FFTY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDEC or FFTY?

FFTY has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to IDEC (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEC dropped -8.51% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

Which ETF is better, IDEC or FFTY?

On 1-year performance, FFTY leads with 43.43% vs 17.13% for IDEC. On fees, FFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, IDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDEC or FFTY?

Over the 1-year period, FFTY has performed better with a 43.43% return vs 17.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDEC or FFTY?

FFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IDEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDEC or FFTY?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for IDEC.

What is the main difference between IDEC and FFTY?

IDEC is categorized as Options Trading, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IDEC and 0.80% for FFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.