IDEC vs. FFTY
IDEC (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December) and FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. IDEC is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, IDEC returned 17.21% vs 13.28% for FFTY. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
IDEC vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEC achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's 6.26% return.
IDEC
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 17.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.16%
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 13.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- -2.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $863.41K | $1.19M | $1.59M | |
| $59.29K | $40.98K | $55.83K |
IDEC vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEC Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December | 7.83% | 21.78% | 2.50% | 3.27% |
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 6.26% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEC and FFTY is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IDEC and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEC vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
IDEC
FFTY
IDEC vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDEC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.07 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 0.41 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 1.00 | +9.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDEC vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEC drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEC and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -59.46% | +50.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -23.29% | +16.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -25.10% | +24.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -22.32% | +20.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 9.51% | -7.84% |
Volatility
IDEC vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) is 2.81%, while CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that IDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 8.45% | -5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | 29.16% | -21.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.12% | 36.53% | -27.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 29.75% | -20.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 27.79% | -18.11% |
IDEC vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDEC vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
IDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 1.27% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
IDEC Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEC and FFTY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to IDEC (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEC dropped -8.51% vs FFTY's -59.46%.
On 1-year performance, IDEC leads with 17.21% vs 13.28% for FFTY. On fees, FFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, IDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IDEC has performed better with a 17.21% return vs 13.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IDEC.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for IDEC.
IDEC is categorized as Options Trading, while FFTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and CapForce. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IDEC and 0.80% for FFTY.
IDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDEC and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer