PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEC vs. AJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEC vs. AJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEC achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than AJUL's 3.05% return.


IDEC

1D
-1.58%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
4.16%
6M
5.44%
1Y
13.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AJUL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.49%
YTD
3.05%
6M
3.60%
1Y
9.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEC vs. AJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IDEC and AJUL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.64

The correlation between IDEC and AJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEC vs. AJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEC
IDEC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

AJUL
AJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEC vs. AJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDECAJULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.65

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

4.20

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

24.77

-16.74

IDEC vs. AJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the AJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEC and AJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDECAJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.88

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

1.60

-0.33

Drawdowns

IDEC vs. AJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEC drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, which is greater than AJUL's maximum drawdown of -6.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEC and AJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDECAJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-6.06%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-2.19%

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.03%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-0.50%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.37%

+1.31%

Volatility

IDEC vs. AJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) at 0.18%. This indicates that IDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDECAJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

0.18%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

2.50%

+5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

3.20%

+5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.68%

4.99%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.68%

4.99%

+4.69%

IDEC vs. AJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEC vs. AJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither IDEC nor AJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IDEC and AJUL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDEC has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to AJUL (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEC dropped -8.51% vs AJUL's -6.06%.

On 1-year performance, IDEC leads with 13.46% vs 9.15% for AJUL. On fees, AJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IDEC has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IDEC.

IDEC and AJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IDEC and 0.79% for AJUL.

AJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEC and AJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer