PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEC vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEC vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEC achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.07% return.


IDEC

1D
-1.58%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
4.16%
6M
5.44%
1Y
13.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
1.07%
6M
0.53%
1Y
9.04%
3Y*
0.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEC vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IDEC and TLTW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2023

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEC vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEC
IDEC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEC vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDECTLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.52

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

4.52

+3.51

IDEC vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEC and TLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDECTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.19

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

-0.03

+1.31

Drawdowns

IDEC vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEC drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEC and TLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDECTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-18.61%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-5.97%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-3.33%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-8.24%

+6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.01%

-0.33%

Volatility

IDEC vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 2.36%. This indicates that IDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDECTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.36%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

5.80%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

7.64%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.68%

11.38%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.68%

11.38%

-1.70%

IDEC vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEC vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

IDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.77%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IDEC
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.77%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDEC and TLTW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDEC has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to TLTW (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEC dropped -8.51% vs TLTW's -18.61%.

On 1-year performance, IDEC leads with 13.46% vs 9.04% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IDEC has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IDEC.

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.77%, compared with 0.00% for IDEC.

IDEC is categorized as Options Trading, while TLTW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IDEC and 0.35% for TLTW.

IDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEC and TLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer