PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDCBY vs. CICHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
8.84%32.13%47.21%3.91%-2.05%-6.39%-12.54%13.02%-8.08%42.02%
CICHY
China Construction Bank Corp
8.77%31.78%49.67%4.46%-2.29%-3.15%-8.81%11.09%-7.66%33.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IDCBY:

$312.57B

CICHY:

$268.26B

EPS

IDCBY:

$19.94

CICHY:

$24.18

PE Ratio

IDCBY:

0.88

CICHY:

0.89

PEG Ratio

IDCBY:

1.10

CICHY:

0.08

PS Ratio

IDCBY:

0.21

CICHY:

0.30

PB Ratio

IDCBY:

0.08

CICHY:

0.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

IDCBY:

$1.49T

CICHY:

$986.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IDCBY:

$665.53B

CICHY:

$739.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

IDCBY:

$429.60B

CICHY:

$390.06B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IDCBY having a 8.84% return and CICHY slightly lower at 8.77%. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has underperformed CICHY with an annualized return of 12.36%, while CICHY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


IDCBY

1D
-0.90%
1M
8.34%
YTD
8.84%
6M
22.14%
1Y
31.01%
3Y*
28.30%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
12.36%

CICHY

1D
-1.51%
1M
7.84%
YTD
8.77%
6M
14.44%
1Y
28.70%
3Y*
29.12%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDCBY vs. CICHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDCBY
IDCBY Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IDCBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDCBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDCBY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IDCBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDCBY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CICHY
CICHY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CICHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CICHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDCBYCICHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

1.29

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

1.91

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.87

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.54

4.84

+2.70

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDCBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the CICHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDCBY and CICHY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDCBYCICHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.29

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.65

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.43

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between IDCBY and CICHY is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Dividend Comparison

IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than CICHY's 5.07% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
4.88%7.76%6.36%8.69%8.61%7.32%4.84%3.91%4.48%3.49%12.32%7.11%
CICHY
China Construction Bank Corp
5.07%8.26%6.71%9.13%8.70%6.32%5.08%4.42%4.80%8.33%10.74%6.14%

Drawdowns

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, which is greater than CICHY's maximum drawdown of -44.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and CICHY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IDCBYCICHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.73%

-44.82%

-33.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-15.49%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.39%

-28.51%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.70%

-40.27%

+0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-1.51%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-18.51%

-30.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

6.00%

-1.98%

Volatility

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 6.05%, while China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CICHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IDCBYCICHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

7.81%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

14.74%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.96%

22.32%

-2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

21.29%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

22.92%

+0.05%

Financials

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and China Construction Bank Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B600.00B700.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
745.00B
327.67B
(IDCBY) Total Revenue
(CICHY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and China Construction Bank Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
48.4%
54.1%
Portfolio components
IDCBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 360.46B and revenue of 745.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

CICHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a gross profit of 177.19B and revenue of 327.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.1%.

IDCBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 67.55B and revenue of 745.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

CICHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported an operating income of 89.79B and revenue of 327.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.

IDCBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 89.14B and revenue of 745.00B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

CICHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a net income of 80.42B and revenue of 327.67B, resulting in a net margin of 24.5%.