PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDCBY vs. CICHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than CICHY's 12.11% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has underperformed CICHY with an annualized return of 12.70%, while CICHY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.


IDCBY

1D
2.37%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
10.39%
6M
11.12%
1Y
30.66%
3Y*
28.48%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
12.70%

CICHY

1D
2.17%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
12.11%
6M
8.48%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
15.61%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
10.39%32.13%47.21%3.91%-2.05%-6.39%-12.54%13.02%-8.08%42.02%
CICHY
China Construction Bank Corp
12.11%31.78%49.67%4.46%-2.29%-3.15%-8.81%11.09%-7.66%33.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IDCBY and CICHY is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2009

0.80

The correlation between IDCBY and CICHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IDCBY:

$308.29B

CICHY:

$289.21B

EPS

IDCBY:

$20.11

CICHY:

$24.86

PE Ratio

IDCBY:

0.86

CICHY:

0.89

PEG Ratio

IDCBY:

1.08

CICHY:

0.08

PS Ratio

IDCBY:

0.24

CICHY:

0.27

PB Ratio

IDCBY:

0.08

CICHY:

0.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

IDCBY:

$1.28T

CICHY:

$1.14T

Gross Profit (TTM)

IDCBY:

$499.90B

CICHY:

$760.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

IDCBY:

$428.13B

CICHY:

$402.61B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDCBY vs. CICHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDCBY
IDCBY Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IDCBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDCBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDCBY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IDCBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDCBY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CICHY
CICHY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CICHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CICHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDCBYCICHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.42

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

2.11

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.76

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.67

4.66

+3.01

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDCBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the CICHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDCBY and CICHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDCBYCICHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.42

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.74

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.60

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.43

-0.28

Drawdowns

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, which is greater than CICHY's maximum drawdown of -44.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and CICHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDCBYCICHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.73%

-44.82%

-33.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-15.49%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.87%

-15.49%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.73%

-27.91%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.70%

-40.27%

+0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-3.45%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.02%

-18.35%

-30.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

5.84%

-1.98%

Volatility

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Volatility Comparison

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDCBYCICHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

4.98%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

14.03%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

19.98%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.20%

21.19%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.87%

22.84%

+0.03%

Dividends

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Dividend Comparison

IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than CICHY's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CICHY
China Construction Bank Corp
2.36%8.26%6.71%9.13%8.70%6.32%5.08%4.42%4.80%8.33%10.74%6.14%
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
7.81%7.76%6.36%8.69%8.61%7.32%4.84%3.91%4.48%3.49%12.32%7.11%

Financials

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and China Construction Bank Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B350.00B400.00B20222023202420252026
386.17B
345.49B
(IDCBY) Total Revenue
(CICHY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IDCBY vs. CICHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and China Construction Bank Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
40.3%
61.1%
Portfolio components
IDCBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 155.43B and revenue of 386.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

CICHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a gross profit of 211.00B and revenue of 345.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.

IDCBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 101.34B and revenue of 386.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

CICHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported an operating income of 99.20B and revenue of 345.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.7%.

IDCBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 86.42B and revenue of 386.17B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.

CICHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a net income of 86.29B and revenue of 345.49B, resulting in a net margin of 25.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IDCBY and CICHY have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CICHY has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to IDCBY (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDCBY dropped -78.73% vs CICHY's -44.82%.

IDCBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDCBY and CICHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer