IDCBY vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.89%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current IDCBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDCBY and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.58%, more than VOO's 1.29% yield.

The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and VOO.

The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 3.33%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.