PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IDCBY vs. BYDDY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


IDCBYBYDDY
YTD Return9.57%-1.45%
1Y Return8.32%-8.94%
3Y Return (Ann)0.98%9.95%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.07%32.30%
10Y Return (Ann)5.29%17.98%
Sharpe Ratio0.39-0.27
Daily Std Dev21.63%33.40%
Max Drawdown-45.80%-87.26%
Current Drawdown-16.88%-35.17%

Fundamentals


IDCBYBYDDY
Market Cap$247.09B$84.78B
EPS$2.71$2.85
PE Ratio3.8819.06
PEG Ratio0.590.80
Revenue (TTM)$655.64B$602.32B
Gross Profit (TTM)$735.57B$71.41B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between IDCBY and BYDDY is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than BYDDY's -1.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has underperformed BYDDY with an annualized return of 5.29%, while BYDDY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
196.72%
1,387.68%
IDCBY
BYDDY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited

BYD Co Ltd ADR

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and BYD Co Ltd ADR (BYDDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDCBY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.73
BYDDY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BYDDY, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.45

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDCBY Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the BYDDY Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of IDCBY and BYDDY.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.39
-0.27
IDCBY
BYDDY

Dividends

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Dividend Comparison

IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than BYDDY's 0.59% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
7.89%8.65%8.59%7.27%5.79%4.71%5.37%4.25%6.08%6.88%5.82%5.71%
BYDDY
BYD Co Ltd ADR
0.59%0.58%0.06%0.07%0.03%0.59%0.34%0.30%1.03%0.00%0.21%0.00%

Drawdowns

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, smaller than the maximum BYDDY drawdown of -87.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and BYDDY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
-16.88%
-35.17%
IDCBY
BYDDY

Volatility

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 4.98%, while BYD Co Ltd ADR (BYDDY) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYDDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
4.98%
7.87%
IDCBY
BYDDY

Financials

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and BYD Co Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items