PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IDCBY vs. BYDDY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and BYD Co Ltd ADR (BYDDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.99%
29.77%
IDCBY
BYDDY

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 32.87% return, which is significantly higher than BYDDY's 24.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has underperformed BYDDY with an annualized return of 5.88%, while BYDDY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.54% annualized return.


IDCBY

YTD

32.87%

1M

0.33%

6M

6.60%

1Y

33.69%

5Y (annualized)

3.60%

10Y (annualized)

5.88%

BYDDY

YTD

24.60%

1M

-8.12%

6M

26.34%

1Y

11.19%

5Y (annualized)

48.71%

10Y (annualized)

19.54%

Fundamentals


IDCBYBYDDY
Market Cap$281.96B$109.96B
EPS$2.71$3.22
PE Ratio4.4721.25
PEG Ratio1.690.67
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.41T$677.00B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.41T$137.21B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.63B$63.18B

Key characteristics


IDCBYBYDDY
Sharpe Ratio1.160.22
Sortino Ratio1.810.59
Omega Ratio1.231.07
Calmar Ratio1.070.14
Martin Ratio7.240.61
Ulcer Index4.46%13.35%
Daily Std Dev27.87%37.82%
Max Drawdown-46.03%-97.37%
Current Drawdown-5.58%-35.89%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between IDCBY and BYDDY is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and BYD Co Ltd ADR (BYDDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.160.22
The chart of Sortino ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.810.59
The chart of Omega ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.231.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.070.14
The chart of Martin ratio for IDCBY, currently valued at 7.24, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.007.240.61
IDCBY
BYDDY

The current IDCBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the BYDDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDCBY and BYDDY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.16
0.22
IDCBY
BYDDY

Dividends

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Dividend Comparison

IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.03%, more than BYDDY's 1.26% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
7.03%8.64%8.51%7.37%5.73%4.70%5.33%4.23%6.00%6.81%5.77%5.70%
BYDDY
BYD Co Ltd ADR
1.26%0.60%0.07%0.07%0.03%0.60%0.36%0.30%1.06%0.00%0.20%0.00%

Drawdowns

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum BYDDY drawdown of -97.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and BYDDY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.58%
-35.89%
IDCBY
BYDDY

Volatility

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 8.28%, while BYD Co Ltd ADR (BYDDY) has a volatility of 10.73%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYDDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.28%
10.73%
IDCBY
BYDDY

Financials

IDCBY vs. BYDDY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and BYD Co Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items