IDCBY vs. SWBI
Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IDCBY or SWBI.
Key characteristics
| IDCBY | SWBI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.08% | 24.72% |
| 1Y Return | 10.27% | 44.73% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.14% | 1.79% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.23% | 19.63% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.34% | 4.26% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.41 | 0.95 |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.64% | 46.27% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.80% | -99.94% |
| Current Drawdown | -16.49% | -84.17% |
Fundamentals
| IDCBY | SWBI | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $247.09B | $781.52M |
| EPS | $2.71 | $0.57 |
| PE Ratio | 3.88 | 30.12 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $655.64B | $521.46M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $735.57B | $384.56M |
Correlation
The correlation between IDCBY and SWBI is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than SWBI's 24.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has outperformed SWBI with an annualized return of 5.34%, while SWBI has yielded a comparatively lower 4.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Dividend Comparison
IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than SWBI's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 7.86% | 8.65% | 8.59% | 7.27% | 5.79% | 4.71% | 5.37% | 4.25% | 6.08% | 6.88% | 5.82% | 5.71% |
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 2.86% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, smaller than the maximum SWBI drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and SWBI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 4.57%, while Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities