IDCBY vs. SWBI
Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IDCBY or SWBI.
Correlation
The correlation between IDCBY and SWBI is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IDCBY:
1.60
SWBI:
-0.47
IDCBY:
2.34
SWBI:
-0.45
IDCBY:
1.30
SWBI:
0.93
IDCBY:
1.50
SWBI:
-0.22
IDCBY:
9.89
SWBI:
-1.28
IDCBY:
4.58%
SWBI:
17.42%
IDCBY:
28.36%
SWBI:
47.78%
IDCBY:
-46.03%
SWBI:
-100.00%
IDCBY:
-1.34%
SWBI:
-100.00%
Fundamentals
IDCBY:
$292.50B
SWBI:
$483.59M
IDCBY:
$2.69
SWBI:
$0.78
IDCBY:
4.61
SWBI:
14.09
IDCBY:
$1.41T
SWBI:
$514.64M
IDCBY:
$1.41T
SWBI:
$158.31M
IDCBY:
$2.63B
SWBI:
$73.45M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 38.84% return, which is significantly higher than SWBI's -23.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has outperformed SWBI with an annualized return of 5.19%, while SWBI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.95% annualized return.
IDCBY
38.84%
4.50%
17.30%
44.14%
3.31%
5.19%
SWBI
-23.08%
-23.29%
-27.50%
-23.37%
10.05%
3.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Dividend Comparison
IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than SWBI's 5.08% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 6.73% | 8.64% | 8.51% | 7.37% | 5.73% | 4.70% | 5.33% | 4.23% | 6.00% | 6.81% | 5.77% | 5.70% |
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 5.08% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum SWBI drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and SWBI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 6.50%, while Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a volatility of 24.71%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities