Correlation
The correlation between IDCBY and SWBI is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
IDCBY vs. SWBI
Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IDCBY or SWBI.
Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
IDCBY:
1.50
SWBI:
-0.95
IDCBY:
1.85
SWBI:
-1.15
IDCBY:
1.25
SWBI:
0.82
IDCBY:
2.32
SWBI:
-0.52
IDCBY:
8.01
SWBI:
-1.31
IDCBY:
4.52%
SWBI:
28.96%
IDCBY:
27.97%
SWBI:
40.77%
IDCBY:
-46.05%
SWBI:
-96.59%
IDCBY:
-1.43%
SWBI:
-69.36%
Fundamentals
IDCBY:
$326.70B
SWBI:
$418.91M
IDCBY:
$2.69
SWBI:
$0.65
IDCBY:
5.38
SWBI:
14.65
IDCBY:
0.50
SWBI:
0.85
IDCBY:
0.48
SWBI:
1.15
IDCBY:
$1.01T
SWBI:
$333.90M
IDCBY:
$1.01T
SWBI:
$89.53M
IDCBY:
$211.68B
SWBI:
$25.33M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than SWBI's -4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has outperformed SWBI with an annualized return of 4.89%, while SWBI has yielded a comparatively lower -0.57% annualized return.
IDCBY
11.47%
6.31%
27.58%
43.23%
16.54%
10.78%
4.89%
SWBI
-4.53%
3.25%
-28.08%
-40.64%
-11.58%
3.85%
-0.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IDCBY
SWBI
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Dividend Comparison
IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.58%, more than SWBI's 5.46% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 8.58% | 6.29% | 8.64% | 8.51% | 7.37% | 5.73% | 4.70% | 5.33% | 4.23% | 6.00% | 6.81% | 5.77% |
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 5.46% | 5.05% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum SWBI drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and SWBI.
Loading data...
Volatility
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 3.33%, while Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Profitability Comparison
IDCBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 211.39B and revenue of 211.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
SWBI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.95M and revenue of 115.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
IDCBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 155.24B and revenue of 211.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 73.4%.
SWBI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.13M and revenue of 115.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.
IDCBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 84.16B and revenue of 211.39B, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.
SWBI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 1.66M and revenue of 115.89M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.