IDCBY vs. SWBI
Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IDCBY or SWBI.
Correlation
The correlation between IDCBY and SWBI is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IDCBY:
2.06
SWBI:
-0.38
IDCBY:
2.78
SWBI:
-0.28
IDCBY:
1.38
SWBI:
0.96
IDCBY:
1.87
SWBI:
-0.26
IDCBY:
13.08
SWBI:
-0.88
IDCBY:
4.29%
SWBI:
20.55%
IDCBY:
27.27%
SWBI:
47.94%
IDCBY:
-46.05%
SWBI:
-96.59%
IDCBY:
-2.46%
SWBI:
-67.19%
Fundamentals
IDCBY:
$297.86B
SWBI:
$454.55M
IDCBY:
$2.67
SWBI:
$0.78
IDCBY:
4.75
SWBI:
13.24
IDCBY:
$1.02T
SWBI:
$514.64M
IDCBY:
$1.02T
SWBI:
$158.31M
IDCBY:
$212.23B
SWBI:
$73.45M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than SWBI's 2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has outperformed SWBI with an annualized return of 5.07%, while SWBI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.15% annualized return.
IDCBY
-2.46%
5.07%
19.33%
54.24%
5.15%
5.07%
SWBI
2.23%
2.89%
-30.79%
-18.27%
10.84%
2.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IDCBY
SWBI
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Dividend Comparison
IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, more than SWBI's 4.94% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 9.78% | 6.29% | 8.64% | 8.51% | 7.37% | 5.73% | 4.70% | 5.33% | 4.23% | 6.00% | 6.81% | 5.77% |
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 4.94% | 5.05% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum SWBI drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and SWBI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Volatility Comparison
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) has a higher volatility of 10.57% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) at 7.97%. This indicates that IDCBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities