IDCBY vs. SWBI
Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI).
Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 9.84% | 32.13% | 47.21% | 3.91% | -2.05% | -6.39% | -12.54% | 13.02% | -8.08% | 42.02% |
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 46.55% | 3.12% | -22.59% | 62.17% | -49.58% | 1.64% | 150.33% | -27.84% | 0.16% | -39.09% |
Fundamentals
IDCBY:
$315.42B
SWBI:
$642.34M
IDCBY:
$19.94
SWBI:
$0.27
IDCBY:
0.89
SWBI:
53.23
IDCBY:
0.21
SWBI:
1.31
IDCBY:
0.08
SWBI:
1.77
IDCBY:
$1.49T
SWBI:
$486.22M
IDCBY:
$665.53B
SWBI:
$128.56M
IDCBY:
$429.60B
SWBI:
$21.91M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than SWBI's 46.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has outperformed SWBI with an annualized return of 12.46%, while SWBI has yielded a comparatively lower -2.04% annualized return.
IDCBY
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 28.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
SWBI
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 21.55%
- YTD
- 46.55%
- 6M
- 48.98%
- 1Y
- 61.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.85%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- -2.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDCBY vs. SWBI — Risk / Return Rank
IDCBY
SWBI
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDCBY | SWBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 1.34 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 2.15 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.20 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 4.76 | +3.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDCBY | SWBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.34 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | -0.02 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | -0.04 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.16 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between IDCBY and SWBI is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Dividend Comparison
IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than SWBI's 3.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 4.84% | 7.76% | 6.36% | 8.69% | 8.61% | 7.32% | 4.84% | 3.91% | 4.48% | 3.49% | 12.32% | 7.11% |
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 3.63% | 5.27% | 5.05% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, smaller than the maximum SWBI drawdown of -96.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and SWBI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDCBY | SWBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.73% | -96.15% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.37% | -27.81% | +15.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.39% | -75.38% | +44.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.70% | -81.49% | +41.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -51.50% | +49.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.50% | -49.48% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 12.84% | -8.78% |
Volatility
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 5.95%, while Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a volatility of 18.34%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IDCBY | SWBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 18.34% | -12.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.01% | 33.43% | -20.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 46.41% | -26.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 48.05% | -26.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 52.12% | -29.14% |
Financials
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Profitability Comparison
IDCBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 360.46B and revenue of 745.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
SWBI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.59M and revenue of 135.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.2%.
IDCBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 67.55B and revenue of 745.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
SWBI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.71M and revenue of 135.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
IDCBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 89.14B and revenue of 745.00B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.
SWBI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 3.75M and revenue of 135.71M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.