IDCBY vs. SWBI
IDCBY (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited) and SWBI (Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. IDCBY operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while SWBI operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, IDCBY returned 12.80%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for SWBI. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly lower than SWBI's 70.48% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has outperformed SWBI with an annualized return of 12.80%, while SWBI has yielded a comparatively lower 0.17% annualized return.
IDCBY
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- 30.84%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
SWBI
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 70.48%
- 6M
- 64.97%
- 1Y
- 101.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- -7.76%
- 10Y*
- 0.17%
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 13.77% | 32.13% | 47.21% | 3.91% | -2.05% | -6.39% | -12.54% | 13.02% | -8.08% | 42.02% |
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 70.48% | 3.12% | -22.59% | 62.17% | -49.58% | 1.64% | 150.33% | -27.84% | 0.16% | -39.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDCBY and SWBI is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2009 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
IDCBY:
$317.74B
SWBI:
$754.52M
IDCBY:
CN¥20.11
SWBI:
$0.41
IDCBY:
6.00
SWBI:
40.38
IDCBY:
1.70
SWBI:
1.42
IDCBY:
0.55
SWBI:
2.00
IDCBY:
CN¥1.28T
SWBI:
$523.85M
IDCBY:
CN¥499.90B
SWBI:
$141.10M
IDCBY:
CN¥428.13B
SWBI:
-$1.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDCBY vs. SWBI — Risk / Return Rank
IDCBY
SWBI
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDCBY | SWBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.51 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 4.93 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.37 | 15.55 | -10.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, smaller than the maximum SWBI drawdown of -96.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and SWBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDCBY | SWBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.73% | -96.15% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -20.78% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.59% | -54.24% | +38.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.73% | -75.38% | +49.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.70% | -81.49% | +41.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -43.58% | +40.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.86% | -49.47% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 6.57% | -2.64% |
Volatility
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 6.56%, while Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a volatility of 18.36%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDCBY | SWBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 18.36% | -11.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 29.28% | -16.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.49% | 44.24% | -25.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 47.01% | -25.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 51.88% | -29.08% |
Dividends
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Dividend Comparison
IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, more than SWBI's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 7.58% | 7.76% | 6.36% | 8.69% | 8.61% | 7.32% | 4.84% | 3.91% | 4.48% | 3.49% | 12.32% | 7.11% |
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 3.12% | 5.27% | 5.05% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Profitability Comparison
IDCBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 155.43B and revenue of 386.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
SWBI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.09M and revenue of 178.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.
IDCBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 101.34B and revenue of 386.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
SWBI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.34M and revenue of 178.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.
IDCBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 86.42B and revenue of 386.17B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.
SWBI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 16.22M and revenue of 178.39M, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IDCBY and SWBI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWBI has higher volatility (18.36%) compared to IDCBY (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDCBY dropped -78.73% vs SWBI's -96.15%.
SWBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDCBY and SWBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer