IDCBY vs. SWBI
Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IDCBY or SWBI.
Correlation
The correlation between IDCBY and SWBI is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IDCBY:
1.72
SWBI:
-1.06
IDCBY:
2.36
SWBI:
-1.40
IDCBY:
1.32
SWBI:
0.78
IDCBY:
2.35
SWBI:
-0.59
IDCBY:
10.78
SWBI:
-1.62
IDCBY:
4.59%
SWBI:
26.35%
IDCBY:
28.71%
SWBI:
40.28%
IDCBY:
-46.05%
SWBI:
-96.59%
IDCBY:
-7.28%
SWBI:
-70.52%
Fundamentals
IDCBY:
$316.88B
SWBI:
$403.06M
IDCBY:
$2.69
SWBI:
$0.65
IDCBY:
5.06
SWBI:
14.09
IDCBY:
0.48
SWBI:
0.82
IDCBY:
0.47
SWBI:
1.11
IDCBY:
$803.09B
SWBI:
$493.05M
IDCBY:
$801.22B
SWBI:
$146.19M
IDCBY:
$211.68B
SWBI:
$58.26M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly higher than SWBI's -8.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has outperformed SWBI with an annualized return of 4.24%, while SWBI has yielded a comparatively lower -1.01% annualized return.
IDCBY
4.85%
-6.84%
15.74%
47.87%
9.07%
4.24%
SWBI
-8.14%
-7.55%
-27.93%
-41.95%
10.46%
-1.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IDCBY vs. SWBI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IDCBY
SWBI
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Dividend Comparison
IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%, more than SWBI's 5.68% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 9.09% | 6.29% | 8.64% | 8.51% | 7.37% | 5.73% | 4.70% | 5.33% | 4.23% | 6.00% | 6.81% | 5.77% |
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 5.68% | 5.05% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum SWBI drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and SWBI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 10.13%, while Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a volatility of 11.08%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
IDCBY vs. SWBI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities