CICHY vs. ACGBY
Compare and contrast key facts about China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) and Agricultural Bank of China PK (ACGBY).
Performance
CICHY vs. ACGBY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CICHY vs. ACGBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICHY China Construction Bank Corp | 8.77% | 31.78% | 49.67% | 4.46% | -2.29% | -3.15% | -8.81% | 11.09% | -7.66% | 33.81% |
ACGBY Agricultural Bank of China PK | -3.71% | 43.43% | 65.14% | 24.56% | 8.26% | 0.75% | -13.39% | 6.94% | -3.48% | 28.00% |
Fundamentals
CICHY:
$268.26B
ACGBY:
$262.98B
CICHY:
$24.18
ACGBY:
$19.28
CICHY:
0.89
ACGBY:
0.92
CICHY:
0.08
ACGBY:
0.13
CICHY:
0.30
ACGBY:
0.22
CICHY:
0.08
ACGBY:
0.09
CICHY:
$986.17B
ACGBY:
$1.19T
CICHY:
$739.60B
ACGBY:
$720.58B
CICHY:
$390.06B
ACGBY:
$327.15B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CICHY achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly higher than ACGBY's -3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CICHY has underperformed ACGBY with an annualized return of 13.71%, while ACGBY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.35% annualized return.
CICHY
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 7.84%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 14.44%
- 1Y
- 28.70%
- 3Y*
- 29.12%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
ACGBY
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 24.73%
- 3Y*
- 37.57%
- 5Y*
- 22.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CICHY vs. ACGBY — Risk / Return Rank
CICHY
ACGBY
CICHY vs. ACGBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) and Agricultural Bank of China PK (ACGBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CICHY | ACGBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.99 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.55 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 1.27 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 2.82 | +2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CICHY | ACGBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.99 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.01 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.69 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.34 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between CICHY and ACGBY is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CICHY vs. ACGBY - Dividend Comparison
CICHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than ACGBY's 4.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICHY China Construction Bank Corp | 5.07% | 8.26% | 6.71% | 9.13% | 8.70% | 6.32% | 5.08% | 4.42% | 4.80% | 8.33% | 10.74% | 6.14% |
ACGBY Agricultural Bank of China PK | 4.84% | 6.83% | 10.53% | 8.42% | 9.62% | 6.83% | 5.86% | 4.84% | 5.45% | 10.15% | 11.73% | 6.06% |
Drawdowns
CICHY vs. ACGBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CICHY drawdown since its inception was -44.82%, smaller than the maximum ACGBY drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHY and ACGBY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CICHY | ACGBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.82% | -52.60% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.49% | -18.52% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.51% | -21.86% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.27% | -43.69% | +3.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -10.90% | +9.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.51% | -19.77% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 8.37% | -2.37% |
Volatility
CICHY vs. ACGBY - Volatility Comparison
China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) and Agricultural Bank of China PK (ACGBY) have volatilities of 7.81% and 7.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CICHY | ACGBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 7.87% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.74% | 16.86% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.32% | 25.15% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 22.78% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 23.84% | -0.92% |
Financials
CICHY vs. ACGBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corp and Agricultural Bank of China PK. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CICHY vs. ACGBY - Profitability Comparison
CICHY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a gross profit of 177.19B and revenue of 327.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.1%.
ACGBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agricultural Bank of China PK reported a gross profit of 180.77B and revenue of 338.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.
CICHY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported an operating income of 89.79B and revenue of 327.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.
ACGBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agricultural Bank of China PK reported an operating income of 88.75B and revenue of 338.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
CICHY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a net income of 80.42B and revenue of 327.67B, resulting in a net margin of 24.5%.
ACGBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agricultural Bank of China PK reported a net income of 81.35B and revenue of 338.98B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.