PortfoliosLab logo
IDCBY vs. AXP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IDCBY and AXP is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IDCBY vs. AXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and American Express Company (AXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IDCBY:

1.50

AXP:

0.79

Sortino Ratio

IDCBY:

1.85

AXP:

1.27

Omega Ratio

IDCBY:

1.25

AXP:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

IDCBY:

2.32

AXP:

0.88

Martin Ratio

IDCBY:

8.01

AXP:

2.76

Ulcer Index

IDCBY:

4.52%

AXP:

9.19%

Daily Std Dev

IDCBY:

27.97%

AXP:

32.34%

Max Drawdown

IDCBY:

-46.05%

AXP:

-83.91%

Current Drawdown

IDCBY:

-1.43%

AXP:

-9.47%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IDCBY:

$327.04B

AXP:

$206.94B

EPS

IDCBY:

$2.69

AXP:

$14.33

PE Ratio

IDCBY:

5.36

AXP:

20.61

PEG Ratio

IDCBY:

2.36

AXP:

2.10

PS Ratio

IDCBY:

0.50

AXP:

3.34

PB Ratio

IDCBY:

0.47

AXP:

6.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

IDCBY:

$1.01T

AXP:

$75.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IDCBY:

$1.01T

AXP:

$62.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

IDCBY:

$211.68B

AXP:

$14.80B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDCBY achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than AXP's -0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IDCBY has underperformed AXP with an annualized return of 4.89%, while AXP has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.


IDCBY

YTD

11.47%

1M

5.08%

6M

27.58%

1Y

41.51%

3Y*

16.54%

5Y*

10.78%

10Y*

4.89%

AXP

YTD

-0.36%

1M

10.37%

6M

-2.94%

1Y

25.36%

3Y*

21.93%

5Y*

26.99%

10Y*

15.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


American Express Company

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IDCBY vs. AXP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDCBY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IDCBY is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IDCBY is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IDCBY is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IDCBY is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IDCBY is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IDCBY is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AXP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AXP is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AXP is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AXP is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AXP is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AXP is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AXP is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IDCBY vs. AXP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) and American Express Company (AXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IDCBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the AXP Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDCBY and AXP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

IDCBY vs. AXP - Dividend Comparison

IDCBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.58%, more than AXP's 0.99% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IDCBY
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
8.58%6.29%8.64%8.51%7.37%5.73%4.70%5.33%4.23%6.00%6.81%5.77%
AXP
American Express Company
0.99%0.91%1.24%1.35%1.05%1.42%1.29%1.51%1.32%1.61%1.58%1.05%

Drawdowns

IDCBY vs. AXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDCBY drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum AXP drawdown of -83.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDCBY and AXP.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

IDCBY vs. AXP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) is 3.33%, while American Express Company (AXP) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that IDCBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

IDCBY vs. AXP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and American Express Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B20212022202320242025
211.39B
18.93B
(IDCBY) Total Revenue
(AXP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IDCBY vs. AXP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and American Express Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
83.5%
(IDCBY) Gross Margin
(AXP) Gross Margin
IDCBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 211.39B and revenue of 211.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

AXP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, American Express Company reported a gross profit of 15.82B and revenue of 18.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

IDCBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 155.24B and revenue of 211.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 73.4%.

AXP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, American Express Company reported an operating income of 3.33B and revenue of 18.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

IDCBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 84.16B and revenue of 211.39B, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.

AXP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, American Express Company reported a net income of 2.58B and revenue of 18.93B, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.