ICMB vs. VO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ICMB (Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.) is a stock, while VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) is Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, ICMB returned -5.98%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for VO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ICMB vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICMB achieves a -56.30% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ICMB has underperformed VO with an annualized return of -5.98%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.

ICMB

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: -15.11%
• YTD: -56.30%
• 6M: -56.78%
• 1Y: -55.98%
• 3Y*: -21.23%
• 5Y*: -16.01%
• 10Y*: -5.98%

VO

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 6M: 9.10%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: 16.26%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICMB vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICMB Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.	-56.30%	5.92%	0.74%	19.01%	-18.96%	15.99%	-16.38%	23.01%	-13.98%	-2.71%
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	10.36%	11.62%	15.31%	16.03%	-18.73%	24.70%	18.10%	30.98%	-9.24%	19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ICMB and VO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2014	0.16

Return for Risk

ICMB vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICMB

ICMB Risk / Return Rank: 4
ICMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ICMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ICMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ICMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ICMB Martin Ratio Rank: 1

VO

VO Risk / Return Rank: 43
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICMB vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICMB	VO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.13	1.39	-2.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.68	2.00	-3.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.24	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	2.18	-3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.10	8.21	-10.31

ICMB vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICMB Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICMB and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICMB vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICMB drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than VO's maximum drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMB and VO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICMB	VO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.34%	-58.87%	-21.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.14%	-8.17%	-53.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.14%	-19.02%	-43.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.71%	-27.57%	-36.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.34%	-39.37%	-40.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.40%	-1.29%	-62.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.49%	-7.85%	-11.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.69%	2.16%	+24.53%

Volatility

ICMB vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.46%. This indicates that ICMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICMB	VO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.91%	4.46%	+7.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.86%	9.84%	+37.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.56%	12.81%	+36.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.13%	17.66%	+21.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.39%	18.93%	+25.46%

Dividends

ICMB vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

ICMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.73%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICMB Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.	23.73%	19.26%	17.82%	17.72%	17.02%	12.73%	15.93%	14.93%	16.00%	12.27%	15.12%	18.14%
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	1.36%	1.52%	1.49%	1.52%	1.60%	1.12%	1.45%	1.48%	1.82%	1.35%	1.45%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICMB and VO in my portfolio?

ICMB and VO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICMB or VO?

ICMB has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to VO (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICMB dropped -80.34% vs VO's -58.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.